Non-profit

Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)

This is a logo for Natural Resources Defense Council. (link)
Website:

www.nrdc.org

Location:

NEW YORK, NY

Tax ID:

13-2654926

Tax-Exempt Status:

501(c)(3)

Budget (2020):

Revenue: $197,585,835
Expenses: $185,007,361
Assets: $467,259,503

Formation:

1970

Contact InfluenceWatch with suggested edits or tips for additional profiles.

Also see Natural Resources Defense Council Action Fund (nonprofit)

Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) is one of the nation’s largest environmentalist groups. The group has more than $180 million in assets to fund its programs and has been accused of “using baseless scare campaigns to drum up press and funding.”1 NRDC has repeatedly supported the shutdown of zero-carbon nuclear power plants. 2 3 4 5

If was formed in 1970 by a small group of law students and attorneys at the forefront of the environmental movement.6 Today, it claims more than 2 million members and online activists, which includes 500 scientists, lawyers, and policy advocates to advance the environmentalist agenda.7

Critics of NRDC argue that some of the council’s stances have made life harder for farmers and other industries.8 Environmentalists have expressed concern that NRDC’s endowment holdings in the gas and oil industry might expose NRDC and the movement to charges of hypocrisy.9

Notable Initiatives

NRDC helped back a campaign by SeaWeb in the late 1990s called “Give Swordfish a Break,” claiming that the species was being overfished.10 But Rebecca Lent, director of the Highly Migratory Species Division at the National Marine Fisheries Services, said that was an exaggeration. “Swordfish are not considered endangered,” she said. “I think [the campaign] will end up having a detrimental effect on our fishermen. I know a lot…who have lost their jobs already.”11

The council opposed the Water Rights Protection Act. That legislation, which stalled in the U.S. Senate in 2016 after previously being stymied by Democratic Party opposition in 2014, would have prevented federal agencies from requiring certain entities to give up water rights to use public lands.12 Bill proponents, such as farmers and ski area operators, said existing policy, which NRDC supported, could deny them water rights for which they had already paid.13

“Sue and Settle”

A Washington Examiner investigation discovered at least nine examples of NRDC participating in a “sue and settle” process (among more than 70 examples of the practice among left-leaning groups) with the Environmental Protection Agency during the first term of the Obama administration.14 In this process, a group sues the EPA in federal court to get the agency to issue new regulations by a certain date. The EPA and the plaintiff then meet behind closed doors and agree on a deal. Finally, a judge issues a consent decree making that agreement – usually whatever the group wanted done – the law.15

Anti-Trump Activity

NRDC took aim at President Donald Trump following his inauguration, criticizing his disdain for President Barack Obama’s Clean Power Plan and for green-lighting the Keystone XL pipeline. NRDC urged its followers to “tell Congress to stand up to Trump’s anti-environment agenda.”16 The State Department said the pipeline, which will move tar sands oil from Canada to refineries on the Gulf Coast in Texas, serves the nation by protecting American interests in energy security.17

Anti-Animal Antiobiotics

The Natural Resources Defense Council released a report in September of 2017 detailing its new goal to stop restaurants from purchasing meat from farmers who utilize antibiotics in their animal care. 1819

Opposition to Nuclear Energy

Nuclear power plants produce no carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gas emissions, and as of 2021 accounted for 20 percent of American electricity production—the largest source of zero carbon electricity in the United States. 20  An October 2018 proposal from The Nature Conservancy noted that zero-carbon nuclear plants produced 7.8 percent of total world energy output and recommended reducing carbon emissions by increasing nuclear capacity to 33 percent of total world energy output. 21

NRDC has repeatedly supported the shutdown of nuclear power plants. Environmental Progress accused NRDC of “hypocrisy” because NRDC advocated for taxpayer subsidies for wind and solar energy but opposed similar assistance for nuclear energy. 22

In a June 2021 blog post, NRDC senior scientist Mohit Chhabra stated his organization had “been working for years to retire the aging Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant” in California. 23 During 2017 and 2018 NRDC staffers also argued for shutting down nuclear energy facilities in New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Ohio. 24 25

In April 2021, the NRDC celebrated the closing of the Indian Point nuclear power plant in New York. 26 NRDC cited concerns about plant safety due to a series of incidents including a transformer fire, radioactive spills, and failed accident drills. After Indian Point was built in the 1960s, researchers found out that it was located in a seismic zone and that seismic activity “could exceed the earthquake design for the facility,” according to a Nuclear Regulatory Commission panel on the issue. 27 NRDC claimed that New York’s renewable energy sources will be able to make up for the loss of power provided by Indian Point with solar and wind energy. 28 However, the New York Times reported that more fossil fuels were burned in New York to make up for the closure of Indian Point and that Indian Point had been producing more power than all of the wind turbines and solar panels in New York combined. 29

Pesticides

Pesticide Action Network

Also see Pesticide Action Network of North America (PANNA) (nonprofit)

NRDC joined the Pesticide Action Network in April 2017 in suing the EPA over its decision against banning chlorpyrifos, a pesticide some have linked to nervous system and brain disorders. The pesticide is heavily used by farmers, who opposed a ban. NRDC had originally sued the EPA during the Obama administration to pressure the agency to propose a ban.30

Alar Apples

The NRDC was the main promoter of a hoax in that led to the “Great Apples Scare” of 1989. The group claimed that apples sprayed with the chemical Alar—a plant-growth regulating powder used to prevent the pre-harvest rotting of apples—could give people cancer. The NRDC claimed that “the average pre-schooler’s exposure was estimated to result in a cancer risk 240 times greater than the cancer risk considered acceptable by [the Environmental Protection Agency] following a full lifetime of exposure.”

Environmentalists—most notably actress Meryl Streep—falsely claimed that children would develop cancer by eating apples treated with Alar, causing the apple industry to take a major hit as parents stopped buying the fruit for their children and schools stopped purchasing it as well.31

While the NRDC was the main promoter of the hoax, it used the Tides Foundation as a go-between to pay the fees for Fenton Communications, which promoted the story in the media. 32 33 The campaign eventually resulted in the Environmental Protection Agency banning Alar in 1989.

A lab study conducted by the American Council on Science and Health in 1999 showed that a consumer would need to consume over 5,000 gallons of Alar-laced apple juice per day to reach the NRDC’s cancer risk claims. Dr. Richard Adamson, director of the National Cancer Institute’s Division of Cancer Etiology, later said: “The risk of eating an apple treated with Alar is less than the risk of eating a peanut butter sandwich or a well-done hamburger.”34 35

Controversies

Ties to the White House

Between January 2021 to September 2022, former NRDC president Gina McCarthy served as the White House Climate Czar under the Biden Administration. According to Fox News Digital, visitor logs show that the current NRDC president Manish Bapna has visited the White House at least twice as of September 2022. In addition, nonprofit watchdog organization Protect the Public’s Trust shared that the organization, “regularly communicates with Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry’s office.” 36

Connections to the Chinese Communist Part (CCP)

On the organization’s website, the NRDC discusses how it has worked with, “Chinese and international partners” to advocate for policies within China to “fortify” its own, “environmental regulations.” 37 The Chinese language version of the NRDC’s website further states that the organization’s office in Beijing is, “registered under the Beijing Municipal Public Security Bureau and supervised by the National Forestry and Grassland Administration of China.” 38 The NRDC’s managing director of its international program, Amanda Maxwell, released a statement to Fox News Digital claiming, ”

“We advise our sponsor, the Chinese National Forestry and Grassland Administration, of our work plan for in-country activities involving any Chinese entity, government or private…we provide the agency with an annual report assessing the outcome of our work, which centers on providing independent analysis and policy recommendations to the government of China…In China, as elsewhere, the NRDC operates in accordance with the law.” 39

In addition to work within the country, several members of staff within the NRDC’s Beijing office have either previously worked within the CCP or left the NRDC for a government position. For example, the director of NRDC’s China program, Jieqing Zhang, previously served as the deputy director-general of China’s International Cooperation Department under the Ministry of Ecology and Environment. Another example is the NRDC’s strategic advisor for its Beijing office, JingJing Qian, whom previously served in a position within China’s Ministry of Science and Technology. In addition, local project manager for the NRDC’s climate and energy project in Beijing, Hui Huang, previously worked for state-owned electric company the China Datang Corporation. 40 The NRDC has also released several blog posts praising China for, “doing a lot to address its problems at home and to help fight climate change,” 41

During an interview with Fox News Digital in September 2022, H. Sterling Burnett, director of think tank Heartland Institute’s Center on Climate and Environmental Policy, commented on the NRDC’s lack of criticism of the CCP government. “First off, they know that China can just kick them out. Secondly, it’s hard to bite the hand that feeds you. If you’re being paid not to criticize somebody, then you don’t need to criticize them.”42 In addition, a 2018 letter sent by Rep. Bruce Westerman (R-AR) and former Rep. Rob Bishop (R-UT) to NRDC leadership stated, “The NRDC’s relationship with China has many of the criteria identified by U.S. intelligence agencies and law enforcement as putting an entity at risk of being influenced or coerced by foreign interests.” 43

People

Manish Bapna is the current president and chief executive officer (CEO) of the NRDC as of August 2021. She previously served as the executive vice president and managing director of the World Resources Institute (WRI). Prior to this, she served as the executive director of nonprofit organization Bank Information Center (BIC), which oversees environmental standards of financial institutions, and the World Bank beforehand. In addition, she had previously worked with consulting firm McKinsey & Company in 1986. 44

Rhea Suh previously served as president of the NRDC from January 2015 until August 2021, when Manish Bapna took the position as president and CEO. 45 “She previously worked as assistant secretary for policy, management, and budget at the U.S. Department of the Interior under President Obama. Before that, she developed environmental programs at the left-leaning David and Lucile Packard Foundation and William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. 46 Prior to Suh assuming the office, Frances Beinecke served as president and NRDC reported paying her $493,864 in total compensation in 2014, according to the organization’s IRS 990 form.47 That document reveals that NRDC reported paying just shy of $50 million in total salaries and wages that year, with at least 17 employees making total compensation of more than $200,000 each.48

Kathleen A. Welch is the chair of the board of trustees for the NRDC as of February 2023. She is also the founder and principal of environmentalist consulting firm Corridor Partners. 49 50

Daniel Tishman, whom was the previous chair of the board of trustees, serves as Chair Emeritus for the board. 51 Tishman is CEO of Tishman Realty & Construction Company. In 2006, then-New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg (then-R, now I), a prominent environmentalist funder, appointed him to the city’s Sustainability Advisory Board, which helped advise his administration’s environmental policy. 52

Other board members include Hollywood stars Leonardo DiCaprio and Robert Redford, singer James Taylor, 501 Development Corporation founder Peter Morton, environmental activist Tom Roush and 11th Hour Project founder Wendy Schmidt.53

Funding

NRDC reports $155,192,637 in revenue and $126,749,686 in expenses on its IRS 990 form for 2015.54

Energy Foundation is a major funder of NRDC, having given nearly $3 million in 2011, for example. That organization opposes fossil fuels and is heavily backed by environmental activist and billionaire Tom Steyer.55 Steyer has made substantialprofits from investments in oil and gas, particularly with Farallon Capital, which Steyer founded in 1986.56

NRDC itself may also benefit from the success of companies that deal in fossil fuels, fueling charges of hypocrisy. The Nation found in an investigation that the council holds stocks in mutual funds and other assets that do not screen for fossil fuels.57

NRDC paid Washington, D.C.-based Devine Mulvey, Inc. $5,592,029 for media consulting services in 2014.58 The council provides grants to a variety of organizations with aligned missions. Examples from 2014 include $15,000 to Alaska Wilderness League, $103,000 to the Blue Green Alliance, $89,500 to Catskill Mountainkeeper, $1.2 million to Partnership Project, Inc., and $33,000 to West Harlem Environmental Action.59

References

  1. Big Green Radicals: Natural Resources Defense Council. Accessed May 2, 2017. https://www.biggreenradicals.com/group/natural-resources-defense-council/
  2. Chhabra, Mohit. “CPUC’s Clean Energy Order: Necessary, Timely, and Ambitious.” Natural Resources Defense Council. June 21, 2021. Accessed August 16, 2021. https://www.nrdc.org/experts/mohit-chhabra/cpucs-much-needed-ambitious-and-timely-clean-energy-order.
  3. Bryk, Dale. “New Jersey’s Nuclear Bailout Explained: First Look.” Natural Resources Defense Council. December 15, 2017. Accessed August 16, 2021. https://www.nrdc.org/experts/dale-bryk/new-jerseys-nuclear-bailout-explained-first-look.
  4. Moore, John. “FirstEnergy Attempts An Illegal Power Plant Bailout Scheme.” Natural Resources Defense Council. March 30, 2018. Accessed August 16, 2021. https://www.nrdc.org/experts/john-moore/fe-test.
  5. Kennedy, Kit. “Indian Point Is Closing, but Clean Energy Is Here to Stay.” NRDC. National Resources Defense Council, April 28, 2021. https://www.nrdc.org/experts/kit-kennedy/indian-point-closing-clean-energy-here-stay.
  6. Natural Resources Defense Council: About Us – Mission. Accessed April 26, 2017. https://www.nrdc.org/about#mission
  7. Natural Resources Defense Council: About Us – Mission. Accessed April 26, 2017. https://www.nrdc.org/about#mission
  8. Henry, Devin. “Groups sue EPA for not banning pesticide.” The Hill. April 5, 2017. Accessed April 26, 2017. http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/327449-groups-sue-over-epa-pesticide-decision
  9. Klein, Naomi. “Why Aren’t Environmental Groups Divesting from Fossil Fuels?” The Nation. May 2, 2013. Accessed April 26, 2017. https://www.thenation.com/article/why-arent-environmental-groups-divesting-fossil-fuels/
  10. Staff. “Falling for the Swordfish Campaign: Hook Lie and Sinker.” April 1, 1999. Consumer Freedom Accessed April 27, 2017. https://www.consumerfreedom.com/articles/56-falling-for-the-swordfish-campaign-hook-lie-and-sinker/
  11. Staff. “Falling for the Swordfish Campaign: Hook Lie and Sinker.” April 1, 1999. Consumer Freedom Accessed April 27, 2017. https://www.consumerfreedom.com/articles/56-falling-for-the-swordfish-campaign-hook-lie-and-sinker/
  12. Congress.gov: S.982 Water Rights Protection Act. Accessed April 26, 2017. https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/982
  13. Kasperowicz, Pete. “Private water rights bill clears House.: The Hill. March 13, 2014. Accessed April 26, 2017. http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/votes/200773-private-water-rights-bill-clears-house
  14. Staff. “EPA’s back-room ‘sue and settle’ deals require reform.” May 25, 2013. Washington Examiner. Accessed April 27, 2017. http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/epas-back-room-sue-and-settle-deals-require-reform/article/2530505
  15. Staff. “EPA’s back-room ‘sue and settle’ deals require reform.” May 25, 2013. Washington Examiner.  Accessed April 27, 2017. http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/epas-back-room-sue-and-settle-deals-require-reform/article/2530505
  16. Natural Resources Defense Council: “Tell Congress: Stand Up To Trump’s Anti-Environment Agenda.” Accessed April 26, 2017. https://secure.nrdconline.org/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=4215&s_src=WBLCPPPETNON0317NRHP&_ga=1.117364292.355038538.1493229114
  17. Staff. “Trump administration approves Keystone XL pipeline.” Fox News. March 24, 2017. Accessed May 2, 2017. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/03/24/trump-administration-reportedly-set-to-approve-keystone-pipeline.html
  18. “Reduce Antibiotic Misuse in Livestock.” Natural Resources Defense Council. May 16, 2017. Accessed October 24, 2017. https://www.nrdc.org/issues/reduce-antibiotic-misuse-livestock.
  19. “Chapter 7: Costs of Eliminating Subtherapeutic Use of Antibiotics.” In The Use of Drugs in Food Animals: Benefits and Risks, 179-87. Wallingford, Oxon: CABI Publ., 1999. Accessed October 24, 2017. https://www.nap.edu/read/5137/chapter/9.
  20. “Nuclear explained.” U.S. Energy Information Administration. Accessed August 16, 2021. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/nuclear/us-nuclear-industry.php
  21. “ The Science of Sustainability.” The Nature Conservancy. October 13, 2018. Accessed August 16, 2021. https://www.nature.org/en-us/what-we-do/our-insights/perspectives/the-science-of-sustainability
  22. “NRDC.” Environmental Progress. Accessed August 17, 2021. https://environmentalprogress.org/nrdc>
  23. Chhabra, Mohit. “CPUC’s Clean Energy Order: Necessary, Timely, and Ambitious.” Natural Resources Defense Council. June 21, 2021. Accessed August 16, 2021. https://www.nrdc.org/experts/mohit-chhabra/cpucs-much-needed-ambitious-and-timely-clean-energy-order.
  24. Bryk, Dale. “New Jersey’s Nuclear Bailout Explained: First Look.” Natural Resources Defense Council. December 15, 2017. Accessed August 16, 2021. https://www.nrdc.org/experts/dale-bryk/new-jerseys-nuclear-bailout-explained-first-look.
  25. Moore, John. “FirstEnergy Attempts An Illegal Power Plant Bailout Scheme.” Natural Resources Defense Council. March 30, 2018. Accessed August 16, 2021. https://www.nrdc.org/experts/john-moore/fe-test.
  26. Kennedy, Kit. “Indian Point Is Closing, but Clean Energy Is Here to Stay.” NRDC. National Resources Defense Council, April 28, 2021. https://www.nrdc.org/experts/kit-kennedy/indian-point-closing-clean-energy-here-stay.
  27. “Earthquakes May Endanger New York More Than Thought, Says Study.” Earth Institute, August 21, 2008. https://www.earth.columbia.edu/articles/view/2235.
  28. Kennedy, Kit. “Indian Point Is Closing, but Clean Energy Is Here to Stay.” NRDC. National Resources Defense Council, April 28, 2021. https://www.nrdc.org/experts/kit-kennedy/indian-point-closing-clean-energy-here-stay.
  29. Mcgeehan, Patrick. “Indian Point Is Shutting Down. That Means More Fossil Fuel.” The New York Times. The New York Times, April 12, 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/12/nyregion/indian-point-power-plant-closing.html.
  30. Henry, Devin. “Groups sue EPA for not banning pesticide.” The Hill. April 5, 2017. Accessed April 26, 2017. http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/327449-groups-sue-over-epa-pesticide-decision
  31. Feldman, Clarice. “Meryl Streep and Julia Child: Apples and Oranges.” American Thinker. March 2, 2008. Accessed February 11, 2017. http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2008/03/meryl_streep_and_julia_child_a.html.
  32. “Tides Foundation & Tides Center.” Activist Facts. Accessed February 11, 2017.  https://www.activistfacts.com/organizations/225-tides-foundation-tides-center/.
  33. “Behind the Scenes: The Lefty PR Group that Stokes Consumer Fear of BPA.” Media Research Center. Accessed February 11, 2017. http://www.mrc.org/special-reports/behind-scenes-lefty-pr-group-stokes-consumer-fear-bpa.
  34. Hayden Ludwig. “Tides’ Legal Laundering: An Incubator for the Left.” Capital Research Center. March 27, 2018. Accessed November 29, 2018. https://capitalresearch.org/article/tides-legal-laundering-an-incubator-for-the-left-three/
  35. “An Unhappy Anniversary: The Alar ‘Scare’ Ten Years Later.” American Council on Science and Health. February 1, 1999. Accessed November 29, 2018. https://www.acsh.org/news/1999/02/01/an-unhappy-anniversary-the-alar-scare-ten-years-later
  36. Catenacci, Thomas. “Green group influencing Biden admin has deep ties to Chinese government.” Fox News, September 26, 2022. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/green-group-influencing-biden-admin-deep-ties-chinese-government
  37. Catenacci, Thomas. “Green group influencing Biden admin has deep ties to Chinese government.” Fox News, September 26, 2022. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/green-group-influencing-biden-admin-deep-ties-chinese-government
  38. Catenacci, Thomas. “Green group influencing Biden admin has deep ties to Chinese government.” Fox News, September 26, 2022. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/green-group-influencing-biden-admin-deep-ties-chinese-government
  39. Catenacci, Thomas. “Green group influencing Biden admin has deep ties to Chinese government.” Fox News, September 26, 2022. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/green-group-influencing-biden-admin-deep-ties-chinese-government
  40. Catenacci, Thomas. “Green group influencing Biden admin has deep ties to Chinese government.” Fox News, September 26, 2022. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/green-group-influencing-biden-admin-deep-ties-chinese-government
  41. Catenacci, Thomas. “Green group influencing Biden admin has deep ties to Chinese government.” Fox News, September 26, 2022. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/green-group-influencing-biden-admin-deep-ties-chinese-government
  42. Catenacci, Thomas. “Green group influencing Biden admin has deep ties to Chinese government.” Fox News, September 26, 2022. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/green-group-influencing-biden-admin-deep-ties-chinese-government
  43. Catenacci, Thomas. “Green group influencing Biden admin has deep ties to Chinese government.” Fox News, September 26, 2022. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/green-group-influencing-biden-admin-deep-ties-chinese-government
  44. “Manish Bapna.” Natural Resources Defense Council, Accessed February 21, 2023. https://www.nrdc.org/experts/manish-bapna
  45. “Rhea Suh.” Natural Resources Defense Council, Accessed February 21, 2023. https://www.nrdc.org/experts/rhea-suh
  46. Natural Resources Defense Council: Rhea Suh. Accessed April 26, 2017. https://www.nrdc.org/experts/rhea-suh
  47. Guidestar: Natural Resources Defense Council IRS 990 form for 2015. Accessed April 27, 2017. http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2015/132/654/2015-132654926-0ccd2c59-9.pdf
  48. Guidestar: Natural Resources Defense Council IRS 990 form for 2015. Accessed April 27, 2017. http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2015/132/654/2015-132654926-0ccd2c59-9.pdf
  49. “Board of Trustees.” Natural Resources Defense Council, Accessed February 21, 2023. https://www.nrdc.org/board-trustees
  50. “Corridor Partners.” LinkedIn, Accessed February 21, 2023. https://www.linkedin.com/company/corridor-partners
  51. “Board of Trustees.” Natural Resources Defense Council, Accessed February 21, 2023. https://www.nrdc.org/board-trustees
  52. Bloomberg: Daniel R. Tishman executive profile. Accessed April 27, 2017. http://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/person.asp?personId=6323471&privcapId=701179
  53. Natural Resources Defense Council: Board of Trustees. Accessed April 27, 2017. https://www.nrdc.org/board-trustees
  54. Guidestar: Natural Resources Defense Council IRS 990 form for 2015. Accessed April 27, 2017. http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2015/132/654/2015-132654926-0ccd2c59-9.pdf
  55. Plautz, Jason and Schor, Elana. “Mapping environmentalism’s road ahead.” E&E Daily. December 9, 2013. Accessed April 26, 2017. https://www.eenews.net/eedaily/2013/12/09/stories/1059991471
  56. Bond-Graham, Darwin. “Steye’s Oily Bucks.” Counterpunch. April 9, 2013. Accessed April 26, 2017. http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/04/09/steyers-oily-bucks/
  57. Klein, Naomi. “Why Aren’t Environmental Groups Divesting from Fossil Fuels?” The Nation. May 2, 2013. Accessed April 26, 2017. https://www.thenation.com/article/why-arent-environmental-groups-divesting-fossil-fuels/
  58. Guidestar: Natural Resources Defense Council IRS 990 form for 2015. Accessed April 27, 2017. http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2015/132/654/2015-132654926-0ccd2c59-9.pdf
  59. Guidestar: Natural Resources Defense Council IRS 990 form for 2015. Accessed April 27, 2017. http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2015/132/654/2015-132654926-0ccd2c59-9.pdf

Directors, Employees & Supporters

  1. Kathleen Welch
    Board Member
  2. Adam Albright
    Former Trustee
  3. Van Jones
    Former Board Member
  4. Patricia Bauman
    Board Member
  5. Sujatha Jahagirdar
    Policy Specialist
  6. Jared Huffman
    Former Senior Attorney
  7. Dawn Laguens
    Former Consultant

Donor Organizations

  1. 444S Foundation (Non-profit)
  2. Annenberg Foundation (Non-profit)
  3. Aria Foundation (Non-profit)
  4. Bauman Family Foundation (Non-profit)
  5. Bernard and Anne Spitzer Charitable Trust (Non-profit)
  6. Bloomberg Family Foundation (Bloomberg Philanthropies) (Non-profit)
  7. Bright Horizon Foundation (Non-profit)
  8. Carnegie Corporation of New York (Non-profit)
  9. Cedar Tree Foundation (Non-profit)
  10. Charles Engelhard Foundation (Non-profit)
  11. Craigslist Charitable Fund (Non-profit)
  12. Dalio Philanthropies (Non-profit)
  13. David and Lucile Packard Foundation (Non-profit)
  14. Deer Creek Foundation (Non-profit)
  15. Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (Non-profit)
  16. Elizabeth B. and Arthur E. Roswell Foundation (Non-profit)
  17. Energy Foundation (Non-profit)
  18. Ettinger Foundation (Non-profit)
  19. Falconwood Foundation (Non-profit)
  20. Firedoll Foundation (Non-profit)
  21. Ford Foundation (Non-profit)
  22. Foundation for the Carolinas (FFTC) (Non-profit)
  23. Foundation to Promote Open Society (FPOS) (Non-profit)
  24. Frank E. Payne and Seba B. Payne Foundation (Non-profit)
  25. Google Foundation (Non-profit)
  26. Gordon E. and Betty I. Moore Foundation (Non-profit)
  27. Heising-Simons Foundation (Non-profit)
  28. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation (Non-profit)
  29. John L. Neu Family Foundation (Non-profit)
  30. John Merck Fund (Non-profit)
  31. Joyce Foundation (Non-profit)
  32. JPB Foundation (Non-profit)
  33. Kaphan Foundation (Non-profit)
  34. Kohlberg Foundation (Non-profit)
  35. Kresge Foundation (Non-profit)
  36. Lear Family Foundation (Non-profit)
  37. Lisa and Douglas Goldman Fund (Non-profit)
  38. Louis and Anne Abrons Foundation (Non-profit)
  39. Marcy and Leona Chanin Foundation (Non-profit)
  40. Mariposa Foundation (Non-profit)
  41. Marisla Foundation (Non-profit)
  42. Marty & Dorothy Silverman Foundation (Non-profit)
  43. Max and Anna Levinson Foundation (Non-profit)
  44. McIntosh Foundation (Non-profit)
  45. Merck Family Fund (Non-profit)
  46. Mighty Arrow Family Foundation (Non-profit)
  47. Morningstar Foundation (Non-profit)
  48. Charles Stewart Mott Foundation (Non-profit)
  49. Musk Foundation (Non-profit)
  50. MWC Foundation (Non-profit)
  51. New Venture Fund (NVF) (Non-profit)
  52. Oak Foundation USA (Non-profit)
  53. Oak Hill Fund (Non-profit)
  54. Open Society Foundations (Open Society Institute) (Non-profit)
  55. Overbrook Foundation (Non-profit)
  56. Padosi Foundation (Non-profit)
  57. Park Foundation (Non-profit)
  58. Partnership Project (Non-profit)
  59. Passport Foundation (Non-profit)
  60. Patagonia Org (Non-profit)
  61. Peace Development Fund (Non-profit)
  62. Pew Charitable Trusts (Non-profit)
  63. Pisces Foundation (Non-profit)
  64. Ploughshares Fund (Non-profit)
  65. Prospect Hill Foundation (Non-profit)
  66. Proteus Fund (Non-profit)
  67. Public Welfare Foundation (Non-profit)
  68. Resources Legacy Fund (Non-profit)
  69. Rockefeller Brothers Fund (Non-profit)
  70. Rockefeller Foundation (Non-profit)
  71. Rudolf Steiner Foundation (RSF Social Finance) (Non-profit)
  72. Sandler Foundation (Non-profit)
  73. Schmidt Family Foundation (Non-profit)
  74. Sea Change Foundation (Non-profit)
  75. Silicon Valley Community Foundation (SVCF) (Non-profit)
  76. Skoll Global Threats Fund (Non-profit)
  77. Stephen M. Silberstein Foundation (Non-profit)
  78. Surdna Foundation (Non-profit)
  79. Tides Foundation (Non-profit)
  80. TomKat Charitable Trust (Non-profit)
  81. WestWind Foundation (Non-profit)
  82. William and Flora Hewlett Foundation (Non-profit)
  83. William Penn Foundation (Non-profit)
  84. Wyss Foundation (Non-profit)

Supported Movements

  1. Strike With Us
  See an error? Let us know!

Nonprofit Information

  • Accounting Period: June - May
  • Tax Exemption Received: March 1, 1970

  • Available Filings

    Period Form Type Total revenue Total functional expenses Total assets (EOY) Total liabilities (EOY) Unrelated business income? Total contributions Program service revenue Investment income Comp. of current officers, directors, etc. Form 990
    2020 Jun Form 990 $197,585,835 $185,007,361 $467,259,503 $80,739,367 Y $187,198,934 $4,671,787 $3,054,202 $3,392,003 PDF
    2019 Jun Form 990 $181,821,968 $173,044,173 $442,841,915 $75,364,208 Y $173,735,553 $785,336 $3,731,068 $2,853,451 PDF
    2018 Jun Form 990 $182,319,651 $149,039,578 $411,463,366 $62,051,561 Y $174,988,334 $433,577 $2,598,017 $2,962,415 PDF
    2017 Jun Form 990 $177,129,164 $128,772,908 $366,746,425 $60,522,510 Y $161,593,821 $9,255,127 $2,034,434 $2,693,247 PDF
    2016 Jun Form 990 $129,809,261 $133,435,489 $301,556,189 $65,029,561 Y $127,497,252 $1,089,789 $2,314,441 $2,788,167
    2015 Jun Form 990 $155,192,637 $126,749,686 $306,293,488 $62,607,924 Y $134,361,787 $701,716 $1,694,613 $4,124,855 PDF
    2014 Jun Form 990 $121,617,764 $115,764,382 $293,669,408 $61,608,516 Y $116,474,388 $649,524 $3,528,153 $2,921,180 PDF
    2013 Jun Form 990 $115,962,571 $102,445,255 $268,165,564 $58,992,258 Y $110,866,444 $1,286,887 $2,868,954 $2,715,963 PDF
    2012 Jun Form 990 $98,701,707 $104,264,845 $241,823,296 $58,983,300 Y $92,736,241 $1,671,617 $1,742,327 $1,340,782 PDF
    2011 Jun Form 990 $97,057,964 $98,131,710 $248,951,243 $51,538,183 Y $90,868,193 $4,390,776 $696,553 $1,261,882 PDF

    Additional Filings (PDFs)

    Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)

    40 WEST 20TH STREET
    NEW YORK, NY 10011-4211