Non-profit

Voter Participation Center (VPC)

Logo for The Voter Participation Center (link)
Website:

www.voterparticipation.org/

Location:

WASHINGTON, DC

Tax ID:

55-0889748

DUNS Number:

78-329-8321

Tax-Exempt Status:

501(c)(3)

Budget (2022):

Revenue: $37,381,213
Expenses: $35,070,350
Assets: $18,954,464

Founded:

2003 (renamed in 2011)

Former Name:

Women’s Voices Women Vote (changed in 2011)

Founder:

Page Gardner

President and CEO:

Tom Lopach

Latest Tax Filing:

2022 Form 990

Contact InfluenceWatch with suggested edits or tips for additional profiles.

The Voter Participation Center is a left-of-center voter registration nonprofit that was founded in 2003 as Women’s Voices Women Vote, changing its name in 2011 and expanding its mission to become the Voter Participation Center. 1 2 The group initially focused on registering the strongly Democratic-leaning voting bloc of single women to vote; today, the group organizes registration of numerous Democratic-leaning voting populations.

The Voter Participation Center runs a direct-mail program3  that targets “unmarried women, minorities and millennials” with voter registration mailings and phone calls.45

Since 2004, the Voter Participation Center claims to have “signed up 2.7 million voters.”6 However, the group’s efforts have been criticized for being imprecise,7  misleading,8 ineffective,9 and potentially illegal.10 Moreover, the group’s ties to the Clinton family and the liberal agitation group MoveOn.org have drawn questions about the group’s purported non-partisanship.11

Background

The Voter Participation Center was founded under the name “Women’s Voices Women Vote,” a 501(c)(3) charity focused on registering single women to vote.12 Page Gardner, a former Democratic operative whose first race was the late Sen. Ted Kennedy’s (D-Massachusetts) 1980 presidential bid, and her friend Chris Dresser founded the original Women’s Voices Women Vote group.13 John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign chairman and a senior aide to President Bill Clinton and President Barack Obama, was also said to have “helped launch the Women’s Voices Women Vote prior to the 2004 presidential election and later served on the board.”14

In 2011, Women’s Voices Women Vote officially “renamed itself the Voter Participation Center to reflect a portfolio formally broadened after 2008 to cover the so-called “Rising American Electorate”—a set of liberal voting blocs including single women, young people, and newly naturalized citizens that some progressives believe will create the “Emerging Democratic Majority.”15 In conjunction with the name change, Voter Participation Center enlarged its voter registration focus beyond just women to “unmarried women, minorities and millennials.”16

The Voter Participation Center also has a sister 501(c)(4) called the Women’s Voices Women Vote Action Fund. 17

Organizational Operations

Voter Participation Center, formerly known as Women’s Voices Women Vote, has a repetitive protocol for registering voters that follows a number of steps.

  • The first step is for Voter Participation Center to send “a letter to the state elections board, warning of a likely surge in registration applications.”18
  • The second step is to issue “press releases to news outlets.”19
  • The third step is robocalls “alerting targeted likely voters that a registration mailer is coming.”20
  • The fourth is the mailer itself.21

In the 2012 and 2014 elections combined cycle Voter Participation Center “touted the distribution” of some 10 million registration forms across 25 states “targeting “unmarried women, African-Americans, Latinos and young adults.”2223

In 2016 the Voter Participation Center planned “to mail more than 7.4 million voter registration forms to residents in 13 states: Georgia, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Wisconsin.”24

It should be noted that “many of the Voter Participation Center mailings have gone astray, reaching already registered voters, the deceased, family pets, convicted felons, children, and non-U.S. citizens.”25

Since 2004, the Voter Participation Center claims to have “signed up 2.7 million voters.”26

Experimental Mailings

During campaign years the Voter Participation Center issues quarterly mailings, with each mailing having a “randomized experimental” mailings that test various ways of packaging a registration form, adjusting everything from cover letter language to envelope typography.”27

These direct mail programs say a number of things such as, “you’re not registered to vote. Your mailing address is incorrect. Or something needs to be updated on your voter registration, fill out the attached form and mail it.”28

2020 Election Cycle

In March 2020, Tom Lopach became CEO of both the Voter Participation Center and Center for Voter Information,29 both founded by Page Gardner, another longtime Democratic operative who formerly worked for Ted Kennedy. 30

Under Lopach’s direction, VPC and CVI launched an aggressive campaign over the summer of 2020 to promote absentee ballots and mail-in voting for the 2020 elections. The organizations sent out millions of mailers to battleground states, resulting in 939,000 registration applications and 2 million vote-by-mail applications. 31 By the end of the 2020 election cycle, Lopach’s group had sent ballot applications to 15 million people in swing states, nearly one-third of which were returned. 32

Controversies and Criticism

Partisan Filtering of Voter Registration Ads

In September 2024, the Washington Free Beacon reported that VPC purchased ads with Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and Threads, that used customized audience filters to avoid showing voter registration ads to users that might be Republicans. 33 According to data in Meta’s politics and elections ad library, VPC “spent more than $760,000 on a staggering 8,235 Facebook ads” targeting users in Nevada, Arizona, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and Georgia while instructing Meta to exclude the ads from users whose Facebook profile had previously expressed interest in topics like “PGA Tour,” “Indianapolis 500,” “Daytona 500,” “Tom Clancy,” “Modified Jeeps,” “Duck Dynasty,” and many similar topics colloquially associated with conservative rural Americans. At the same time, VPC directed Meta to include users who were interested in a variety of topics commonly associated with urban and liberal Americans like “African-American Literature,” “Jordan Peele,” “Taylor Swift,” “Patagonia,” and “hot yoga.” The report also noted that VPC has reported paying exorbitant consulting fees to political consulting firms that advertise themselves as experts in helping Democrats win elections.

On September 4, 2024, In response to the Free Beacon’s report, Rep. Claudia Tenney (R., NY) sent a letter to the IRS expressing “serious concern about the Voter Participation Center’s (VPC) adherence to federal tax rules for tax-exempt charitable organizations engaged in voter registration activities.” 34 Tenney noted that “As a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization, VPC is required to conduct voter registration activities in a neutral and non-partisan manner,” and claimed that report “suggests that VPC is deliberately violating these requirements by selectively targeting its advertisements and intentionally excluding conservative audiences.” Tenney then asked the IRS if it would commit to investigating VPC for possible violations of its tax-exempt status, and asked for clarification as to how the IRS determines whether tax-exempt voter registration groups are abiding by the law and what the penalties would be if a violation occurred.

On the same day, VPC issued a public statement responding to Rep. Tenney’s letter claiming that the ad filters were applied to ensure that VPC’s voter registration ads reached “underrepresented populations including people of color, young people, and unmarried women.” In defense of the excluded audience filters VPC wrote:

“To reach these underrepresented populations, VPC uses digital ads to identify prospective voters, and incorporate their likely or known interests into our targeting to engage them online. For example, we used digital interest categories on Facebook to include prospective voters interested in ‘College Football,’ ‘College,’ ‘Fraternities in North America,’ ‘Dorm Life,’ and other terms to find likely young voters. We also used other popular interests, including ‘Taylor Swift,’ ‘I love to Salsa,’ ‘Meet the Browns (TV series),’ ‘Goya Foods,’ and ‘Black History,’ to engage with Black and Hispanic would-be voters. We also exclude interest categories like ‘Luxury Travelers’ and ‘Luxury Shoppers’ that are likely to reach people who are likely to be registered to vote already. This is standard procedure in the digital advertising industry used to reach specific demographics. These practices are not partisan and are fully in line with federal tax rules for tax-exempt charitable organizations. Our one and only goal is to make sure that eligible, underrepresented Americans are able to engage in our democracy, regardless of how they choose to vote.” 35

The statement provided no evidence for the claim that people interested in “Luxury Travelers” and “Luxury Shoppers” were more likely to be registered to vote. The statement also made no mention of the exclusion of users interested in “PGA Tour,” “Indianapolis 500,” “Daytona 500,” “Tom Clancy,” “Modified Jeeps,” and “Duck Dynasty” and did not clarify whether VPC believed people interested in those particular topics were more likely to be registered to vote.

Mailing Fraudulent Absentee Ballots

In the months leading up to 2020 election, CVI and its 501(c)(3), the Voter Participation Center (VPC), were widely criticized for mailing out partially pre-filled absentee ballots and voter registration forms in multiple states.

Fairfax County, Virginia, published a warning “about an inaccurate and potentially misleading mailing from the Center for Voter Information” in August 2020, noting that the group had mixed up the City of Fairfax with neighboring Fairfax County: 36

This group is mass mailing pre-filled, absentee ballot applications to county voters without their request—and the mailer includes return envelopes to send the application to the City of Fairfax, not Fairfax County.

“This mailing is causing great confusion and concern among voters who have been contacting our office,” said Fairfax County General Registrar Gary Scott. “While the mailing may appear to be from an official government agency, the Fairfax County Office of Elections did not send it.”

The mailing is also confusing voters who have previously submitted absentee ballot applications themselves, Scott added. These voters are worried that their applications were not received, leading them to think they need to apply again [emphasis original].

The Virginia Democratic Party wrote a public letter to the chairman of the Virginia State Board of Elections complaining that CVI’s absentee ballot mailers in Virginia “contain several errors,” confusing “Fairfax City and Fairfax County, Franklin City and Franklin County, Richmond City and Richmond County, and Roanoke City and Roanoke County.” According to the letter, CVI’s mailers also “contained incorrect middle initials or names for an unknown number of voters,” including that of the chair of the Democratic Party of Virginia’s Voter Protection Council. 37

The Washington Post called CVI a “voter registration group with a history of sending error-ridden mailers” and criticized the group for having “again sown confusion in Virginia, this time tapping into concerns about mail-in-ballots sparked by President Trump’s repeated allegations . . . of election fraud.” The Post noted that while CVI and VPC are officially “nonpartisan,” “both organizations appear to be more aligned with efforts to defeat the president than with his allies.” 38

Archived examples of VPC/CVI absentee ballot mailings have been identified by the Capital Research Center in the following states:

In North Carolina, local reporters wrote about the deceptive nature of Voter Participation Center’s mailers: “It is important to know while the form looks official and claims it needs your attention right away, it is not from any government agency.”39

In Florida, Chris Cate, a spokesman for the secretary of state’s office, wrote in an email to the Tampa Bay Times that the state was “evaluating whether there is way to prevent Voter Participation Center from sending such confusing letters, which are frequently going to ineligible voters and making many Floridians think the letters came from our department.”40 The Florida secretary of state’s office said it “contacted the organization” and “expressed [its] very serious concern that [VPC was] misleading voters, offered to provide them the complaints sent to the department about their mailings, and asked that they make a concerted effort to improve their lists so that only eligible voters who aren’t registered are being contacted.”41

A comparable situation has occurred in New Mexico, where Ken Ortiz, the chief of staff at the New Mexico secretary of state’s office, said, “Some noncitizens have contacted the state asking why they received the forms when they’d previously been told that they could not vote.”42 Ortiz continued, stating that “We fear that some of these individuals who receive this mailing may feel that they are being encouraged to vote by our office or county government.”43

Imprecise Lists

In 2016, Assistant Attorney General Anna Birkenheier, counsel to the Virginia Department of Elections, wrote to the Voter Participation Center expressing concern “that the mailing had caused “significant voter confusion and concern.”44 Bikenheier wrote, “some of the letters are going to people who are, indeed, registered at their current addresses, and the letters are creating confusion. Some were sent to the deceased. Some went to commercial addresses in Virginia.”45 Birkenheier encouraged VPC to “check their mailing lists.” 46

Voter Participation Center has “[acknowledged] that the databases it uses to contact possible voters are imperfect because they are developed from commercially collected information.” In response to criticisms the Voter Participation Center “says it expects people who receive misdirected mail to simply throw it away.”47

Potentially Illegal Methods

In 2012, Kathryn Biber, the general counsel for the Presidential campaign of former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney (R), contended “that the center’s mass mailing may have violated [Virginia] laws, including those that prohibit falsifying a registration application and communicating false information to voters about their registration status.” In her letter, Biber highlighted that the Center’s materials affirmatively tell mailing recipients that ‘records show that you are eligible to vote in the 2012 presidential election.’” However, in 2009, a Virginia felon who was prosecuted for illegally registering to vote registered after receiving a registration form from the Voter Participation Center.48

Biber also argued that “the center violated the law by ‘pre-populating’ the registration forms, meaning it filled in the names on applications.” Biber argued that “only voters, not a third party registering them, may fill out the application.”49

Ineffective Process

Many of the registrations submitted to states by Voter Participation Center or potential voters have been found to be invalid. Louisiana Secretary of State Tom Schedler (R) noted that “the mailings in his state have been rife with problems,” and that “only about 10 percent of those his office has received have actually been valid registrations.” According to Schedler, “It’s just ridiculous, and I think needs to be exposed for what it is.” Schedler added, “I don’t know why they (Voter Participation Center) would try to, in my opinion, disrupt the process and cause undue work on states.”50

Similarly it was reported that in Colorado, “More than 17,000 Coloradans who are receiving voter registration applications from the Voter Participation Center may be signing insufficient forms.” According to Colorado’s Secretary of State’s office, “the forms failed to include a signature field and affidavit required under state law and other deficiencies.”51

Accusations of Voter Suppression

Also see Women’s Voices Women Vote and the Voter Participation Center (Nonprofits)

Prior to its rebranding in 2011, VPC was known as Women’s Voices Women Vote (WVWV). In 2008, WVWV was identified by NPR as the source of a mass of allegedly illegal automated calls which were received on the day of the Democratic presidential primaries in North Carolina, and seemed to target African American women, suggesting that they register to vote and informing them that a packet with more information would be sent out to them in several days. The calls arrived past the deadline to register to vote in the primary leading to accusations of “voter suppression,” as critics claimed the calls were sent out to confuse voters in African American communities who had already registered to vote which would damage Barack Obama’s standing against rival Hillary Clinton, as these communities were major supporters of then-Sen. Obama. The calls were traced back to WVWV, an organization made up largely of Clinton supporters headed by Gardner, a prominent Clinton ally. 52 WVWV denied the allegations.

Mention in Victory Lab

In his 2012 book The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns, left-leaning journalist Sasha Issenberg identifies WVWV as pretending to engage in nonpartisan voter registration and mobilization activities that were, in fact, partisan and intended to aid Democrats win elections: “Even though the group was officially nonpartisan, for tax purposes, there was no secret that the goal of all its efforts was to generate new votes for Democrats.” 53

The IRS strictly prohibits 501(c)(3) nonprofits from “directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office.” Violation of this rule “may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes.”

Voter registration and education activities “do not constitute prohibited political campaign activity” so long as they are “conducted in a non-partisan manner.” According to the IRS, “voter education or registration activities with evidence of bias that (a) would favor one candidate over another; (b) oppose a candidate in some manner; or (c) have the effect of favoring a candidate or group of candidates, will constitute prohibited participation or intervention.” 54

Leaked Memo Reveals Explicit Partisanship

In 2019, Vox reported on leaked memos from Mind the Gap, a California super PAC which advises wealthy donors on cost-effective methods for supporting the Democratic party. The memos revealed that Mind the Gap was recommending VPC and its affiliate, the Center for Voter Information (CVI), as primary funding targets for benefiting the Democratic party during the 2020 election, despite the fact that VPC and CVI are supposed to be nonpartisan. 55

According to the memo: “The most effective investment Democrats can make in the 2020 elections is in early voter registration targeting minorities and other underrepresented groups in the ‘rising American electorate.’ If well-designed and well-executed such efforts are three to four times more effective than the next best available tactic for increasing net Democratic votes in November 2020.”

The memo also specifically applauds VPC for being one of the most cost-effective organizations in the U.S. when it comes to producing Democratic votes, saying: “Two sister organizations stand out for their efficacy, as established by hundreds of independent, randomized control trials … They are the Voter Participation Center (a 501(c)(3) tax deductible charity) and the Center for Voter Information (nonpartisan but not tax deductible).” 56

The memo also recommends that donors contribute to an organization addressed only as “Everybody Votes,” a pseudonym for a vast network of nonprofits surrounding the Voter Registration Project, one of VPC’s largest donors from 2016 to 2020.

Ties to the Clinton Foundation

WVWV has many ties to the Clinton family. Gardner, in addition to being a longtime supporter of Hillary Clinton, worked on Bill Clinton’s presidential campaign in 1992. Bill Clinton’s former chief-of-staff and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign chairman, John Podesta, was a founding member of WVWV’s board, and Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign manager, Maggie Williams, also formerly held a leadership position in the organization. 57 58

WVWV’s financial integrity has been called into question on multiple occasions. In 2006, the organization paid $800,000, 16 percent of its annual budget, to Gardner’s husband Ron Rosenblith’s company, Integral Resources Inc. for phone services, raising accusations of a conflict of interest. 59 In addition to this, the organization paid large sums to the companies of five other of its leaders, totaling several million dollars.60

Covering Up Spending on Elections

In 2012, a related group founded by Page Gardner, the Women’s Voices Women Vote Action Fund (WVWVAF) (now the Center for Voter Information, VPC’s 501(c)(4) “sister” nonprofit), was criticized when—after telling the FEC that it spent $250,000 on ads supporting a Democratic senator—it reported to the IRS that it did not spend any money on politics. 61

Ties To Democratic Party

Paige Gardner “worked on former President Bill Clinton’s 1992 campaign.”62 Voter Participation Center board member John Podesta served as Bill Clinton’s White House Chief of Staff63 and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign chairman.64 Maggie Williams, who was formerly “on the Women’s Voices (Voter Participation Center) leadership team,” was Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign manager.65

Voter Participation Center has worked in conjunction with the left-wing operation MoveOn.org. Mark Bowes of the Richmond Times-Dispatch noted that “the Voter Participation Center ‘s alignment with a liberal political organization seems to conflict with the group’s oft-stated declaration of nonpartisanship.”66

As an example of this coordination Bowes pointed out that in 2012, Voter Participation Center “sold a mailing list to its sister organization,” which in turn “provided the list to MoveOn.Org Civic Action,” to place “calls to eligible voters to urge them to register to vote in their local communities.” Bowes also noted that in mid-June of 2012, “around the same time the Voter Participation Center began its latest round of mailings, MoveOn.org solicited volunteers within its ranks to make calls on behalf of the center’s registration drive.”67

Voter Participation Center’s chief operating officer defended the group’s intricate political operation. Voter Participation Center is “a 501(c)3 tax-exempt nonprofit organization that is barred from engaging in political activities”; however, “The Women’s Voices Women Vote Action Fund operates as a 501(c)4 nonprofit, which can undertake unlimited lobbying and some activity the IRS would deem political.”68

Funding

Financial Overview

Since 2011, the Voter Participation Center has received $30,986,757 in contributions and has spent $25,297,075 other expenses, with another $3,076,025 in total fundraising expenses.6970717273

The Voter Participation Center: Financial Overview
YearTotal RevenuesTotal ExpendituresGrants PaidNet Assets
2022$3,738,123$35,070,350-$13,585,413
2021$10,906,666$14,978,182$1,778,480$11,974,855
2020$88,302,205$100,315,874$7,098,000$12,597,918
2019$29,612,200$9,161,820-$24,611,587
2018$26,319,259$22,459,986-$4,161,042
2017$4,548,490$6,322,992-$301,369
2016$14,347,155$13,529,542-$2,075,871
2015$2,290,504$4,642,650-$1,258,258
2014$14,194,864$11,299,819$78,820$3,610,404
2013$3,330,151$3,436,158-$715,359
2012$9,777,246$9,263,848-$821,366
2011$3,089,617$2,689,326-$307,968
2010$5,586,520$4,986,525-$708,259
2009$1,502,532$2,695,965-$108,264
2008$7,595,633$11,124,152$100,000$1,301,697
2007$8,477,706$4,146,139$14,250$4,830,216
2006$4,401,856$4,953,063-$498,649
2005$1,383,122$333,268-$1,049,854
Total:$239,403,849$261,409,659$9,069,550$84,518,349

Donors to Voter Participation Center

Known grants to VPC in 2018 include: 74

In 2019, the Silicon Valley Community Foundation (SVCF) donated $3,647,000 to VPC. 75

Conflicted Expenditures

In 2006, it was revealed that Voter Participation Center spent nearly 16% of the nonprofit’s total budget on phone services provided by Voter Participation Center’s founder Page Gardner’s husband. The president of the American Institute of Philanthropy (now known as CharityWatch) responded to the reports by saying, “I think it’s a really big concern…It does give an appearance of a conflict of interest.”76

The Voter Participation Center is reportedly “funded mostly through foundations and individual donations.”78 Gardner manages “hotly debated national public-policy issue campaigns” such as “reproductive rights, civil rights, national budget priorities, technology, and trade.”79 She is also the founder and president of the Women’s Voices Women Vote Action Fund, the Voter Participation Center’s 501(c)(4) sister organization.80

Tom Lopach is the president and chief executive officer of the Voter Participation Center. He had previously worked as chief of staff to senator Jon Tester (D-MT) and Democratic Montana governor Steve Bullock. 81 82

Board Of Directors

Voter Participation Center’s board of directors is comprised of liberal and Democratic Party activists, including

  • Avis Jones-DeWeever, the President and CEO of Incite Unlimited.  83
  • William McNary, the president of USAction, the largest national coalition of progressive organizations, from 1999 to 2012.  84
  • Jill Alper, a member of the Democratic National Committee. 85
  • Gibby Waitzkin, a liberal activist who has worked on previous campaigns for the World Wildlife Fund’s climate campaign, Gore for President 2000, and the Pew Center on Climate Change. 86
  • John Podesta served as a board member until 2013. 87

References

  1. Glueck, Katie. “Stumbling into the ‘marriage gap’.” Politico.  August 2014. Accessed August 12, 2017. http://www.politico.com/story/2014/08/stumbling-into-the-marriage-gap-110156
  2. Wilson, Patrick, “State lawyer says voter registration letters from non-profit are causing “significant voter confusion.” The Virginian-Pilot. April 2016. Accessed August 12, 2017. https://pilotonline.com/news/government/virginia/state-lawyer-says-voter-registration-letters-from-non-profit-are/article_bc48bbcb-131f-5b57-9a9c-498df193d284.html
  3. Glueck, Katie. “Stumbling into the ‘marriage gap’.” Politico.  August 2014. Accessed August 12, 2017. http://www.politico.com/story/2014/08/stumbling-into-the-marriage-gap-110156
  4. Wilson, Patrick, “State lawyer says voter registration letters from non-profit are causing “significant voter confusion.” The Virginian-Pilot. April 2016. Accessed August 12, 2017. https://pilotonline.com/news/government/virginia/state-lawyer-says-voter-registration-letters-from-non-profit-are/article_bc48bbcb-131f-5b57-9a9c-498df193d284.html
  5. Overby, Peter. “Group with Clinton Ties Behind Dubious Robocalls.” NPR. May 2008. Accessed August 12, 2017. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90114863
  6. Wilson, Patrick, “State lawyer says voter registration letters from non-profit are causing “significant voter confusion.” The Virginian-Pilot. April 2016. Accessed August 12, 2017. https://pilotonline.com/news/government/virginia/state-lawyer-says-voter-registration-letters-from-non-profit-are/article_bc48bbcb-131f-5b57-9a9c-498df193d284.html
  7. Wilson, Patrick, “State lawyer says voter registration letters from non-profit are causing “significant voter confusion.” The Virginian-Pilot. April 2016. Accessed August 12, 2017. https://pilotonline.com/news/government/virginia/state-lawyer-says-voter-registration-letters-from-non-profit-are/article_bc48bbcb-131f-5b57-9a9c-498df193d284.html
  8. Van Sickler, Michael. “Florida considers stopping Voter Participation Center’s registration drive letters.” Tampa Bay Times. June 2012. Accessed August 12, 2017.  http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/elections/florida-considers-stopping-voter-participation-centers-registration-drive/1237313
  9. Shawn, Eric. “Nonprofit raises eyebrows with mailings seeking to increase voter registration.” August 2012. Accessed August 12, 2017. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/08/16/voter-registration-mailings-raise-eyebrows.html
  10. Vozzella, Laura. “In Va., the dead and dogs are invited to vote.” July 2012. Accessed August 12, 2017. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/virginia-politics/post/in-va-dogs-and-the-dead-are-invited-to-vote/2012/07/24/gJQAl7Rk7W_blog.html
  11. Bowes, Mark. “Voter Registration group, MoveOn linked.” Richmond Times-Dispatch. July 2012. Accessed August 21, 2017. http://www.richmond.com/news/voter-registration-group-moveon-linked/article_495a53a5-572b-50c6-aba9-dc4e73d20d59.html
  12. ”Judicial Watch Exposes Voter Participation Center Scandal.” Judicial Watch. July 2012. Accessed August 12, 2017. http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2012/07/jw-exposes-voter-participation-center-scandal/
  13. Glueck, Katie. “Stumbling into the ‘marriage gap’.” Politico.  August 2014. Accessed August 12, 2017. http://www.politico.com/story/2014/08/stumbling-into-the-marriage-gap-110156
  14. ”Judicial Watch Exposes Voter Participation Center Scandal.” Judicial Watch. July 2012. Accessed August 12, 2017. http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2012/07/jw-exposes-voter-participation-center-scandal/
  15. Issenberg, Sasha. “Who needs Acorn?” Slate. August 2012. Accessed August 21, 2017. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/victory_lab/2012/08/obama_get_out_the_vote_efforts_how_the_voter_participation_center_is_picking_up_where_acorn_left_off_.html#return2
  16. Wilson, Patrick, “State lawyer says voter registration letters from non-profit are causing “significant voter confusion.” The Virginian-Pilot. April 2016. Accessed August 12, 2017. https://pilotonline.com/news/government/virginia/state-lawyer-says-voter-registration-letters-from-non-profit-are/article_bc48bbcb-131f-5b57-9a9c-498df193d284.html
  17. “Women’s Voices Women Vote Action Fund: About:  Page Gardner.” Women’s Voices Women Vote Website. Undated. Accessed Aug. 24, 2017. https://www.wvwvaf.org/about-wvwvaf/page-gardner/
  18. Overby, Peter. “Group with Clinton Ties Behind Dubious Robocalls.” NPR. May 2008. Accessed August 12, 2017. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90114863
  19. Overby, Peter. “Group with Clinton Ties Behind Dubious Robocalls.” NPR. May 2008. Accessed August 12, 2017. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90114863
  20. Overby, Peter. “Group with Clinton Ties Behind Dubious Robocalls.” NPR. May 2008. Accessed August 12, 2017. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90114863
  21. Overby, Peter. “Group with Clinton Ties Behind Dubious Robocalls.” NPR. May 2008. Accessed August 12, 2017. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90114863
  22. “Nonprofit Voter Participation Center sends election registration docs to dogs, dead people.” CBS News. June 2012. Accessed August 12, 2017.  http://www.cbsnews.com/news/nonprofit-voter-participation-center-sends-election-registration-docs-to-dogs-dead-people/
  23. Glueck, Katie. “Stumbling into the ‘marriage gap’.” Politico.  August 2014. Accessed August 12, 2017. http://www.politico.com/story/2014/08/stumbling-into-the-marriage-gap-110156
  24. Torres, Kristina. “Group wants to register nearly 1 million Georgia voters.” The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. June 2016. Accessed August 12, 2017.  http://www.ajc.com/news/state–regional-govt–politics/group-wants-register-nearly-million-georgia-voters/NlcTz7iajEGK5xQXalBkUP/
  25. Bowes, Mark. “Voter Registration group, MoveOn linked.” Richmond Times-Dispatch. July 2012. Accessed August 21, 2017. http://www.richmond.com/news/voter-registration-group-moveon-linked/article_495a53a5-572b-50c6-aba9-dc4e73d20d59.html
  26. Wilson, Patrick, “State lawyer says voter registration letters from non-profit are causing “significant voter confusion.” The Virginian-Pilot. April 2016. Accessed August 12, 2017. https://pilotonline.com/news/government/virginia/state-lawyer-says-voter-registration-letters-from-non-profit-are/article_bc48bbcb-131f-5b57-9a9c-498df193d284.html
  27. Issenberg, Sasha. “Who needs Acorn?” Slate. August 2012. Accessed August 21, 2017. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/victory_lab/2012/08/obama_get_out_the_vote_efforts_how_the_voter_participation_center_is_picking_up_where_acorn_left_off_.html#return2
  28. Abubey, Faith. “Those ‘Voter Participation Center” Mailings Are Not From The Government.” WFMY Local News. June 2016. Accessed August 12, 2017. http://www.wfmynews2.com/news/local/2-wants-to-know/those-voter-participation-center-mailings-are-not-from-the-government/255257508
  29. “Tom Lopach.” LinkedIn. Accessed September 14, 2020. https://www.linkedin.com/in/tom-lopach-45b049a4/.
  30. Glueck, Katie. “Stumbling into the ‘marriage gap.’ Politico. August 19, 2020. Accessed September 14, 2020. https://www.politico.com/story/2014/08/stumbling-into-the-marriage-gap-110156.
  31. “Make an Informed Choice.” Center for Voter Information. Accessed September 14, 2020. https://www.centerforvoterinformation.org/.
  32. Ball, Molly. “The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election.” Time. Time, February 4, 2021. https://time.com/magazine/us/?fbclid=IwAR02kTXwD7PnzUdGPlzf8KOF_LUCextXSsYkK9k-N-iLyMs3T3z6LX6hBVEpage%2F2page%2F6page%2F7page%2F3page%2F3page%2F2page%2F2page%2F2page%2F3page%2F5page%2F4page%2F485
  33. Kerr, Andrew. “Do You like NASCAR? This ‘non-Partisan’ Voter Registration Group Doesn’t Want to Help You.” Washington Free Beacon, September 1, 2024. https://freebeacon.com/elections/do-you-like-nascar-this-non-partisan-voter-registration-group-doesnt-want-to-help-you/.
  34. Tenney, Claudia. “Congresswoman Tenney Demands IRS Investigate Voter Participation Center.” Representative Claudia Tenney, September 6, 2024. https://tenney.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-tenney-demands-irs-investigate-voter-participation-center.
  35. “Statement: The Voter Participation Center Responds to Congresswoman Claudia Tenney.” Voter Participation Center, September 4, 2024. https://www.voterparticipation.org/statement-vpc-responds-to-congresswoman-claudia-tenney/.

  36. “Fairfax County Election Officials Warn Voters About Inaccurate Center for Voter Information Mailing.” Fairfax County, Virginia. August 6, 2020. Accessed December 9, 2020. https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/publicaffairs/fairfax-county-election-officials-warn-voters-about-inaccurate-center-voter-information-mailing
  37. “DPVA Writes to State Board of Elections re: Erroneous “Center for Voting Information” Absentee Application Mailings.” Blue Virginia. August 6, 2020. Accessed Dec. 9, 2020. https://bluevirginia.us/2020/08/dpva-writes-to-state-board-of-elections-re-erroneous-center-for-voting-information-absentee-application-mailings
  38. Antonio Olivo. “Mail-in ballot applications in Virginia tap into worries about fraud with faulty instructions.” Washington Post. August 6, 2020. Accessed December 9, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/virginia-absentee-ballot-mixup/2020/08/06/5c4029ee-d764-11ea-930e-d88518c57dcc_story.html
  39. Abubey, Faith. “Those ‘Voter Participation Center” Mailings Are Not From The Government.” WFMY Local News. June 2016. Accessed August 12, 2017. http://www.wfmynews2.com/news/local/2-wants-to-know/those-voter-participation-center-mailings-are-not-from-the-government/255257508
  40. Van Sickler, Michael. “Florida considers stopping Voter Participation Center’s registration drive letters.” Tampa Bay Times. June 2012. Accessed August 12, 2017.  http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/elections/florida-considers-stopping-voter-participation-centers-registration-drive/1237313
  41. Van Sickler, Michael. “Florida considers stopping Voter Participation Center’s registration drive letters.” Tampa Bay Times. June 2012. Accessed August 12, 2017.  http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/elections/florida-considers-stopping-voter-participation-centers-registration-drive/1237313
  42. “Dogs, dead people get election documents from nonprofit.” New York Daily News. July 13, 2012. Accessed August 24, 2017.  http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/dogs-dead-people-election-documents-nonprofit-article-1.1113836
  43. “Dogs, dead people get election documents from nonprofit.” New York Daily News. July 13, 2012. Accessed August 24, 2017.  http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/dogs-dead-people-election-documents-nonprofit-article-1.1113836
  44. Wilson, Patrick, “State lawyer says voter registration letters from non-profit are causing “significant voter confusion.” The Virginian-Pilot. April 2016. Accessed August 12, 2017. https://pilotonline.com/news/government/virginia/state-lawyer-says-voter-registration-letters-from-non-profit-are/article_bc48bbcb-131f-5b57-9a9c-498df193d284.html
  45. Wilson, Patrick, “State lawyer says voter registration letters from non-profit are causing “significant voter confusion.” The Virginian-Pilot. April 2016. Accessed August 12, 2017. https://pilotonline.com/news/government/virginia/state-lawyer-says-voter-registration-letters-from-non-profit-are/article_bc48bbcb-131f-5b57-9a9c-498df193d284.html
  46. Wilson, Patrick, “State lawyer says voter registration letters from non-profit are causing “significant voter confusion.” The Virginian-Pilot. April 2016. Accessed August 12, 2017. https://pilotonline.com/news/government/virginia/state-lawyer-says-voter-registration-letters-from-non-profit-are/article_bc48bbcb-131f-5b57-9a9c-498df193d284.html
  47. Van Sickler, Michael. “Florida considers stopping Voter Participation Center’s registration drive letters.” Tampa Bay Times. June 2012. Accessed August 12, 2017.  http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/elections/florida-considers-stopping-voter-participation-centers-registration-drive/1237313
  48. Vozzella, Laura. “In Va., the dead and dogs are invited to vote.” July 2012. Accessed August 12, 2017. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/virginia-politics/post/in-va-dogs-and-the-dead-are-invited-to-vote/2012/07/24/gJQAl7Rk7W_blog.html
  49. Vozzella, Laura. “In Va., the dead and dogs are invited to vote.” July 2012. Accessed August 12, 2017. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/virginia-politics/post/in-va-dogs-and-the-dead-are-invited-to-vote/2012/07/24/gJQAl7Rk7W_blog.html
  50. Shawn, Eric. “Nonprofit raises eyebrows with mailings seeking to increase voter registration.” August 2012. Accessed August 12, 2017. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/08/16/voter-registration-mailings-raise-eyebrows.html
  51. “Colorado Voter Registrations Invalid.” CBS Local News Denver. February 2012. Accessed August 12, 2017. http://denver.cbslocal.com/2012/02/27/colorado-voter-registrations-invalid/
  52. “Group with Clinton Ties Behind Dubious Robocalls.” NPR. 2008. Accessed June 19, 2017.  http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90114863
  53. Sasha Issenberg. The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns2012. P. 305.
  54. “The Restriction of Political Campaign Intervention by Section 501(c)(3) Tax-Exempt Organizations.” Internal Revenue Service. Updated September 23, 2020. Accessed February 8, 2021. https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/charitable-organizations/the-restriction-of-political-campaign-intervention-by-section-501c3-tax-exempt-organizations#:~:text=Under%20the%20Internal%20Revenue%20Code,candidate%20for%20elective%20public%20office.
  55. Schleifer, Theodore. “Inside the Secretive Silicon Valley Group That Has Funneled over $20 Million to Democrats.” Vox. Vox, January 6, 2020. https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/1/6/21046631/mind-the-gap-silicon-valley-democratic-donors-stanford.
  56. Schleifer, Theodore. “Inside the Secretive Silicon Valley Group That Has Funneled over $20 Million to Democrats.” Vox. Vox, January 6, 2020. https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/1/6/21046631/mind-the-gap-silicon-valley-democratic-donors-stanford.
  57. “Group with Clinton Ties Behind Dubious Robocalls.” NPR. 2008. Accessed June 19, 2017.   http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90114863
  58. Press Release. “JW Exposes Voter Participation Center Scandal.” Judicial Watch. July 27, 2012. Accessed February 8, 2021. https://www.judicialwatch.org/corruption-chronicles/jw-exposes-voter-participation-center-scandal/
  59. “Nonprofit’s Contracts Called into Question.” NPR. 2008. Accessed June 20, 2017.  http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90114863
  60. “Nonprofit’s Contracts Called into Question.” NPR. 2008. Accessed June 20, 2017.  http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90114863
  61. “How Nonprofits Spend Millions of Elections and Call it Public Welfare.” ProPublica. 2012. Accessed June 20, 2017. https://www.propublica.org/article/how-nonprofits-spend-millions-on-elections-and-call-it-public-welfare
  62. Overby, Peter. “Group with Clinton Ties Behind Dubious Robocalls.” NPR. May 2008. Accessed August 12, 2017. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90114863
  63. Overby, Peter. “Group with Clinton Ties Behind Dubious Robocalls.” NPR. May 2008. Accessed August 12, 2017. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90114863
  64. Glueck, Katie, Dovere, Edward-Isaac. “Podesta to leave White House post in February.” Politico. Jan. 13, 2015. Accessed Aug. 24, 2017. http://www.politico.com/story/2015/01/john-podesta-leaves-white-house-february-114229
  65. Overby, Peter. “Group with Clinton Ties Behind Dubious Robocalls.” NPR. May 2008. Accessed August 12, 2017. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90114863
  66. Bowes, Mark. “Voter Registration group, MoveOn linked.” Richmond Times-Dispatch. July 2012. Accessed August 21, 2017. http://www.richmond.com/news/voter-registration-group-moveon-linked/article_495a53a5-572b-50c6-aba9-dc4e73d20d59.html
  67. Bowes, Mark. “Voter Registration group, MoveOn linked.” Richmond Times-Dispatch. July 2012. Accessed August 21, 2017. http://www.richmond.com/news/voter-registration-group-moveon-linked/article_495a53a5-572b-50c6-aba9-dc4e73d20d59.html
  68. Bowes, Mark. “Voter Registration group, MoveOn linked.” Richmond Times-Dispatch. July 2012. Accessed August 21, 2017. http://www.richmond.com/news/voter-registration-group-moveon-linked/article_495a53a5-572b-50c6-aba9-dc4e73d20d59.html
  69. The Voter Participation Center, Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax (Form 990), 2011
  70. The Voter Participation Center, Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax (Form 990), 2012
  71. The Voter Participation Center, Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax (Form 990), 2013
  72. The Voter Participation Center, Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax (Form 990), 2014
  73. The Voter Participation Center, Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax (Form 990), 2015
  74. Mark Tapscott. “Corporate America Gives Millions to Groups Registering New Voters in Democratic Areas.” Epoch Times. October 21, 2020. Accessed October 22, 2020. https://www.theepochtimes.com/corporate-america-gives-millions-to-groups-registering-new-voters-in-democratic-areas_3547970.html

    All grants drawn from various donors’ respective Form 990s in 2018 (Schedule I).

  75. Return of Foundation Exempt from Income Tax (Form 990-PF). Silicon Valley Community Foundation. 2019. Schedule I. Archived: https://www.influencewatch.org/app/uploads/2021/06/Silicon-Valley-Community-Foundation-2019-Form-990.pdf. See PDF page 263.
  76. Overby, Peter. “Group with Clinton Ties Behind Dubious Robocalls.” NPR. May 2008. Accessed August 12, 2017. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90114863
  77. Overby, Peter. “Group with Clinton Ties Behind Dubious Robocalls.” NPR. May 2008. Accessed August 12, 2017. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90114863[/note]

    People

    Page Gardner is the founder and was the former president of the Voter Participation Center. In 2003, Page Gardner “founded Women’s Voices Women Vote, the organization now known as Voter Participation Center.”77”Page Gardner.” Voter Participation Center. Accessed August 18, 2017. https://www.voterparticipation.org/our-team/page-gardner/

  78. ”Page Gardner.” Voter Participation Center. Accessed August 18. 2017. https://www.voterparticipation.org/our-team/page-gardner/
  79. “Our History.” The Voter Participation Center. Accessed August 12, 2017. https://www.voterparticipation.org/our-team/board-of-directors/
  80. “About Us.” Voter Participation Center. Accessed March 19, 2021. https://www.voterparticipation.org/about-us/.
  81. “Tom Lopach.” LinkedIn. Accessed March 19, 2021. https://www.linkedin.com/in/tom-lopach-45b049a4.
  82. “Board of Directors.” The Voter Participation Center. Accessed August 12, 2017. https://www.voterparticipation.org/our-team/board-of-directors/
  83. “Board of Directors.” The Voter Participation Center. Accessed August 12, 2017. https://www.voterparticipation.org/our-team/board-of-directors/
  84. “Board of Directors.” The Voter Participation Center. Accessed August 12, 2017. https://www.voterparticipation.org/our-team/board-of-directors/
  85. “Board of Directors.” The Voter Participation Center. Accessed August 12, 2017. https://www.voterparticipation.org/our-team/board-of-directors/
  86. Voter Participation Center, Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax (Form 990), 2015, Part VII Section A
  See an error? Let us know!

Nonprofit Information

  • Accounting Period: December - November
  • Tax Exemption Received: March 1, 2005

  • Available Filings

    Period Form Type Total revenue Total functional expenses Total assets (EOY) Total liabilities (EOY) Unrelated business income? Total contributions Program service revenue Investment income Comp. of current officers, directors, etc. Form 990
    2022 Dec Form 990 $37,381,213 $35,070,350 $18,954,464 $5,369,051 N $37,352,357 $0 $87,354 $431,681
    2021 Dec Form 990 $10,906,666 $14,978,182 $12,945,597 $970,742 N $10,687,140 $0 $165,463 $431,748
    2020 Dec Form 990 $88,302,205 $100,315,874 $15,821,456 $3,223,538 N $85,785,652 $0 $316,254 $1,067,535 PDF
    2019 Dec Form 990 $29,612,200 $9,161,820 $27,314,801 $2,703,214 N $29,609,302 $0 $2,797 $646,310 PDF
    2018 Dec Form 990 $26,319,659 $22,459,986 $4,979,533 $818,491 Y $26,319,071 $0 $588 $476,644 PDF
    2017 Dec Form 990 $4,548,490 $6,322,992 $1,203,167 $901,798 N $4,548,105 $0 $385 $516,981
    2016 Dec Form 990 $14,347,155 $13,529,542 $2,455,189 $379,318 N $14,330,559 $0 $16,568 $456,864 PDF
    2015 Dec Form 990 $2,290,504 $4,642,650 $2,205,618 $947,360 N $2,288,650 $0 $1,844 $464,249 PDF
    2014 Dec Form 990 $14,194,864 $11,299,819 $3,959,675 $349,271 N $13,106,359 $1,087,253 $1,124 $396,149 PDF
    2013 Dec Form 990 $3,330,151 $3,436,158 $2,424,931 $1,709,572 N $3,136,573 $192,747 $831 $483,745 PDF
    2012 Dec Form 990 $9,777,246 $9,263,848 $1,433,473 $612,107 N $9,766,131 $0 $1,108 $506,573 PDF
    2011 Dec Form 990 $2,689,326 $3,089,617 $751,928 $443,960 N $2,689,044 $0 $32 $275,481 PDF
    2010 Dec Form 990 $5,586,520 $4,986,525 $917,527 $209,268 N $5,540,043 $0 $3,764 $420,200 PDF

    Additional Filings (PDFs)

    Voter Participation Center (VPC)

    1707 L ST NW STE 300
    WASHINGTON, DC 20036-4230