Logo for InfluenceWatch InfluenceWatch

Donate
Non-profit

Center for Secure and Modern Elections (CSME)

Parent Organization: New Venture Fund (NVF)
Website:

www.modernelections.org
Formation:

2016
Type:

Elections Advocacy Organization
Project of:

New Venture Fund

The Center for Secure and Modern Elections (CSME) is a left-of-center advocacy organization created as a project of the New Venture Fund, a leading “dark money” pass-through funder and fiscal sponsor, to promote sweeping changes to the elections process, including state laws that automatically register voters at state agencies. 1 2 CSME Action, the group’s lobbying arm, is a project of the Sixteen Thirty Fund, the 501(c)(4) “sister” nonprofit to the New Venture Fund.

The Center for Secure and Modern Elections represents itself as a bipartisan organization, but is funded primarily by left-of-center donors. 3 Its parent organization, the New Venture Fund, is part of a $731 million nonprofit network run by the consulting firm Arabella Advisors in Washington, DC. The New Venture Fund has been criticized by the New York Times for its “system of political financing, which often obscures the identities of donors,” as “dark money,” calling the network “a leading vehicle for it on the Left.” 4 Right-leaning critics have called it a major “dark money outfit” that serves as a way for left-leaning groups to anonymously funnel money toward various advocacy issues. 5

The Center for Secure and Modern Elections primarily engages in advocacy and lobbying for “automatic voter registration” (AVR) laws that would  automatically register eligible individuals to vote when they acquire or renew a driver’s license, apply for social services, or otherwise interact with a state government agency.  The Center for Secure and Modern Elections has also opposed legislation intended to reduce voter fraud in Texas. 6

CSME is closely connected with another left-of-center elections advocacy group, the Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL), which was criticized by liberal and conservative commentators for distributing $350 million in grants from billionaire Mark Zuckerberg to hundreds of county and city elections offices in the months leading up to the 2020 election. 7 8 Critics allege that CTCL’s private funding of elections aided Democratic presidential nominee Joseph Biden in defeating incumbent President Donald Trump, largely by targeting key Democratic cities in swing states critical to the election outcome. 9

Both CTCL and New Venture Fund (in its capacity as the parent organization of CSME) were sued by the Louisiana Attorney General in October 2020 for unlawfully interfering in the state’s 2020 election, “to prevent the injection of unregulated private money into the Louisiana election system,” identifying 13 parishes which were targeted for CTCL grants exceeding $500,000 per parish. 10 A state judge ruled against the state on October 26, 2020, on the grounds that the Attorney General’s office had “no cause of action” for the lawsuit. 11

Founding and History

The Center for Secure and Modern Elections was first active in 201612 and was receiving financial support from other left-leaning organizations by 2017,13 but it is unclear when CSME was first established.

As a project of the New Venture Fund, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit that specializes in passing through grants from major left-of-center donors to activist nonprofits as well as fiscally sponsoring new activist organizations, CSME does not file IRS Form 990 reports and does not exist in the IRS’ nonprofit database. The Center for Secure and Modern Elections’ website provides no information regarding its staff, board of directors, founding, history, or relationship to New Venture Fund. 14

Advocacy

Automatic Voter Registration

The Center for Secure and Modern Elections’ primary cause, automatic voter registration, differs from the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (the “Motor Voter Act”) by requiring qualified citizens be automatically registered to vote at state agencies  rather than simply being offered the opportunity to register. 15 In states with an AVR law, citizens are registered to vote unless they actively and explicitly refuse to be registered. Because they are registered automatically, citizens otherwise disinclined to vote are available to be persuaded to vote for candidates or causes in subsequent elections. 16

The Center for Modern and Secure Elections has hired professional pollsters, consultants, attorneys, and lobbyists in many states as well as nationally to advance its automatic voter registration efforts. 17 18 19 20 21

From 2017 through 2019, the Center for Secure and Modern Elections lobbied for automatic voter registration in Hawaii,22 Nebraska,23 New York,24 Louisiana,25 and Nevada. 26 CSME also collaborated with other left-progressive groups, participated in conferences, forums, and published reports27 promoting automatic voter registration laws. 28 29 30 31 32

Opposition to election security reforms

The Center for Secure and Modern Elections opposed legislation introduced in Texas in 2019 intended to improve election security. The legislation would have increased criminal penalties for providing false information on a voter registration application, increased the investigative powers of law enforcement over elections, and required those helping voters to fill out ballots to provide more information on what assistance they provide. 33 [/note] 34 The Center for Secure and Modern Elections opposed the legislation, which was not enacted into law during the 2019 session. 35

Voting Rights Tour

The Center for Secure and Modern Elections helped organize a ‘Voting Rights History Tour’ for a bipartisan group of elected secretaries of states in 2019. The tour of locations in Alabama with historical significance to voting laws was organized by the National Association of Secretaries of State, the left-leaning Ford Foundation, CSME, and two other left-progressive groups, the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Democracy Fund. 36

Model Legislation

CSME provides its allies with a “Policy Playbook,” with model bill text for automatic voter registration. CSME has pushed for AVR in Connecticut, Oregon, Maine and Maryland. Documentation was also obtained concerning a “Statement of Work” between the NVF and a New York political consultancy company, Dickinson & Avella PLLC. The term of the services started in February 2020 and ran until June 2020. As stated per the document:

In partnership with Marc Solomon and the Center for Secure and Modern Elections (CSME) staff, represent New Venture Fund’s CSME project in support of Automatic Voter Registration and other pro-voter modernizations before the New York State Legislative, Executive and Administrative branches of government.

Marc Solomon also works with the Civitas Public Affairs Group, an ostensibly bipartisan consulting group, which caters to organizations such as Voto Latino, the Campaign Legal Center, the Gill Foundation and the Center for Secure and Modern Elections. 37

Controversies and Criticism

Unlawful Private Funding of Elections Lawsuit (2020)

On October 2, 2021, Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry sued the New Venture Fund (the parent organization of CSME), the Center for Technology and Civic Life (an allied organization), and the consulting firm Full Circle Strategies (which represented both organizations locally) “to prevent the injection of unregulated private money into the Louisiana election system and to protect the integrity of elections in the State by ensuring against the corrosive influence of outside money on Louisiana election officials.” According to the lawsuit, “private contributions to local election officials are unlawful and contrary to the methods for election funding established by law in the State of Louisiana”; the Attorney General sought to have CTCL’s funding declared illegal and be permanently enjoined. 38

The lawsuit alleged that CTCL and New Venture Fund (under the name “Center for Secure and Modern Elections”) had unlawfully “targeted 13 parishes” for elections grants, some of which exceeded $500,000, requiring local registrar’s offices to provide “detailed information about [their] operations, conduct, and expenses” in turn. These transactions were allegedly facilitated by Dawn Maisel Cole, the principal for Full Circle Strategies, who “directly solicited registrars and clerks of court to accept contributions from CTCL and New Venture for the operation of their respective offices.” Besides breaking state law, the Attorney General’s office argued that private funding of elections is barred by the Louisiana state legislature and U.S. Congress for “obvious” reasons: 39

  1. The influence that would inevitably accompany private financial contributions to local elections officials;
  2. Outside donations to local election officials sow distrust in the administration of the election system;
  3. Private contributions would inevitably spawn competition for party and corporate control over local election funding and would lead to bidding for election favor by party and private interests;
  4. Private contributors are likely to be political parties or large corporations that have partisan and/or economic objectives to foster with their contributions to election officials;
  5. Private interests, as in this instance, fund particular parishes and particular aspects of the election that they believe advance their election goals and objectives;
  6. Should registrars and clerks become reliant upon private funding of their governmental activities, they may well be compelled to respond to the objectives of those providing the funding in order to ensure that the funding continues;
  7. Such private funding, washed through non-profit organizations, invites the potential for contributions from foreign governments to the Louisiana system and its election officials;
  8. Private contributions open the door to election suits and contests based upon perceived or actual influence on the part of local election officials in the conduct of an election.

A state judge ruled against the state on October 26, 2020, on the grounds that the Attorney General’s office had “no cause of action” for the lawsuit and it was dismissed. 40

In March 2022, however, the Louisiana appeals court reversed the decision, allowing the Attorney General’s lawsuit to continue. 41 The Louisiana appeals court called the lower court’s ruling “legally incorrect” and stated that the Attorney General’s lawsuit “has stated a course of action to protect an interest of the state by preventing the funding of elections with private money.” 42 43

After the appeals court reinstated the Attorney General’s lawsuit, CTCL, NVF, CSME, and Full Circle Strategies again sought a dismissal of the case, requesting that the state Supreme Court review the appeals court decision. On June 28, 2022, the Louisiana Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Attorney General in a 4-3 decision, allowing the lawsuit to proceed. Speaking about the decision, Erick Kaaral, special counsel of the right-of-center Thomas More Society which has advocated extensively against CTCL funding and “zuckbucks” said, “I’m optimistic that Louisiana courts will find that the CTCL intervention is not legally authorized,” and that “… Our election system was ambushed by billionaires, and they’ve had a huge influence.” 44

Funding

For more information, see New Venture Fund (Nonprofit) and Arabella Advisors (For-Profit)

The Center for Secure and Modern Elections was established as a project of the left-leaning New Venture Fund, which has been criticized as a “dark money” organization that does not publicly disclose donors. 45 New Venture Fund is a leading 501(c)(3) funder of activist groups on the Left, and is managed by the for-profit consultancy Arabella Advisors in Washington, DC.

Several left-wing organizations acknowledge supporting the CSME, including the Bauman Foundation, and the Democracy Fund, which is associated with the liberal billionaire Pierre Omidyar. In 2018, Democracy Fund donated $100,000 to CSME through its fiscal sponsor, New Venture Fund; in 2019, the 501(c)(4) Democracy Fund Voice donated $1 million to CSME Action, the group’s lobbying arm and a project of the Arabella-run Sixteen Thirty Fund, a “sister” nonprofit to the New Venture Fund. 46 47 However, whatever monies these and other foundations have provided to CSME would be sent to New Venture Fund, its fiscal sponsor, as CSME has no legal status as a nonprofit corporation and does not exist in IRS nonprofit records. No information about the Center for Secure and Modern Elections is available on the IRS website for public inspection as of May 2021. 48

In 2020, the New Venture Fund received a grant from the Joyce Foundation of $600,000 for the stated purpose “To support expanding the Center for Secure and Modern Elections’ Cities Project support to elections jurisdictions in WI, MI, MN, and OH for the November 2020 election.” 49

CSME also received a $200,000 contribution from the The Blaustein Foundation in 2020 in “support of the Cities Project” for the purpose of voter engagement. 50 In December of 202o, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) signed automatic voter registration into law. 51

Leadership

The Center for Secure and Modern Elections does not list its leadership, board of directors, or staff on its website. 52 Information about a nonprofit organization’s board and key staff is required by the Internal Revenue Service for tax forms which are available for public inspection, but the IRS has no documents available on its website for the Center for Secure and Modern Elections as of January 2020. 53

Jake Matilsky

Jake Matilsky is the founding director of the Center for Secure and Modern Elections as of 2020. 54 55 According to his LinkedIn profile, his listed experience only goes up to 2015 with his “about” section only stating, “advisor to non profits.” 56 He is also a former advisor for Vote At Home 57, a labor-union funded 58 campaign to replace voting at polling stations with all-mail elections as well as an independent consultant for left-progressive candidates and campaigns. 59 He donated to U.S. Senator Jon Tester (D-MT) in 2018; in FEC disclosures Matilsky listed his employer as New Venture Fund. 60

Sam Oliker-Friedland

Sam Oliker-Friedland is chief counsel for the Center for Secure and Modern Elections (CSME) as well as the executive director for policy think tank Institute for Responsive Government (IRG). 61 He is a former attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division who joined the department during the Obama administration and left after the election President Donald Trump. 62 63 Oliker-Friedland was also the deputy director of Data and Technology at the now-defunct New Organizing Institute (NOI), a training organization once described by Washington Post reporter Brian Fung as, “the Democratic Party’s Hogwarts for digital wizardry.” 64 In 2012 NOI employees Whitney May, Tiana-Epps Johnson, and Donny Bridges started the Center for Tech and Civil Life (CTCL). 65

John Lindback

John Lindback is the former senior advisor for the Campaign for Secure and Modern Elections,. He was director of elections for Oregon’s secretary of state office for eight years and was chief of staff for former Alaska Lieutenant Governor Fran Ulmer (D). 66 67

References

  1. Center for Secure and Modern Elections. Modernelections.org. “Careers”. “Director of implementation”. “New Venture Fund careers”. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://www.modernelections.org/downloads/director-of-implementation2019-06-17.pdf
  2. Democracy Fund. Democracyfund.org. “Impact”. “Our Investees”. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://www.democracyfund.org/portfolio/entry/center-for-secure-and-modern-elections
  3. Center for Secure and Modern Elections. Modernelections.org. “What we do”. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://modernelections.org/what-we-do.html
  4. Kenneth P. Vogel, Katie Robertson. “Top Bidder for Tribune Newspapers Is an Influential Liberal Donor.” New York Times. April 13, 2021. Accessed April 14, 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/13/business/media/wyss-tribune-company-buyer.html
  5. Markay, Lachlan. “Over 100 Left-Wing Groups Sourced to DC Dark Money Outfit”. Washington Free Beacon. October 22, 2015. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://freebeacon.com/issues/over-100-left-wing-groups-sourced-to-d-c-dark-money-outfit/
  6. “Prominent Republican speaks out against Texas bill to punish voter registration errors”. The Fulcrum. May 9, 2019. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://thefulcrum.us/criminalizing-texas-voter-registration
  7. Allen, Mike. “Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan Invest $300 Million in Election Infrastructure,” September 1, 2020. https://www.axios.com/mark-zuckerberg-priscilla-chan-election-security-a4950a93-2efd-42a6-9d7a-5fcc763f9214.html.
  8. Culliford, Elizabeth. “Mark Zuckerberg, Priscilla Chan Donate $100 Million More to U.S. Election Infrastructure,” October 13, 2020. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-zuckerberg-chan/mark-zuckerberg-priscilla-chan-donate-100-million-more-to-u-s-election-infrastructure-idUSKBN26Y22Z.
  9. Hayden Ludwig. “How Mark Zuckerberg Meddled in Virginia’s 2020 Election—UPDATED.” Capital Research Center. March 9, 2021. Accessed March 12, 2021. https://capitalresearch.org/article/how-mark-zuckerberg-meddled-in-virginias-2020-election/
  10. State of Louisiana v. Center for Technology and Civic Life, New Venture Fund, et al. Filed October 2, 2020. Accessed May 12, 2021. Original URL: https://lailluminator.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/2020.10.02-AG-Petition.pdf. Archived URL: https://www.influencewatch.org/app/uploads/2021/05/Louisiana-v-CTCL-New-Venture-Fund.-10.02.2020.pdf
  11. Sam Karlin. “Judge rules against Jeff Landry in suit against Zuckerberg-backed nonprofit over free election money.” The Baton Rouge Advocate. Oct. 26, 2020. Accessed May 12, 2021. https://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/news/politics/elections/article_52b60760-17a9-11eb-9999-ef2b2c1bffcb.html
  12. “The 2016 Elections + Nonpartisan Grantmaking”. Funders Committee for Civic Participation. Funderscommittee.org. January 11, 2016. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://funderscommittee.org/2016-annual-report-table-of-contents/2016-virtual-discussions/the-2016-elections-nonpartisan-grantmaking/
  13. The Bauman Foundation. Baumanfoundation.org. “Grantees”. “New Venture Fund”. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://www.baumanfoundation.org/grantee/119?order=amount&sort=desc
  14. Center for Secure and Modern Elections. Modernelections.org. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://modernelections.org/index.html
  15. “About the National Voter Registration Act”. The United States Department of Justice. Justice.gov. Civil Rights Division home. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://www.justice.gov/crt/about-national-voter-registration-act
  16. Griffin,Rob; Gronke, Paul; Wang, Tova; Kennedy, Liz. “Who Votes With Automatic Voter Registration? “Center for American Progress. Americanprogress.org. “Issues”. “Democracy and Government”. June 7, 2017..  Accessed January 13, 2020. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/democracy/reports/2017/06/07/433677/votes-automatic-voter-registration/
  17. Patkintin Research Strategies. Patinkinresearch.com. “Success Stories”. Accessed January 13, 2020. http://www.patinkinresearch.com/
  18. Civitas Public Affairs Group. Civitaspublicaffairs.com. “Some of our clients”. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://civitaspublicaffairs.com/
  19. Joanna Klonsky Communication Strategies. Joannaklonsky.com. “Clients”.Accessed January 12, 2020. http://joannaklonsky.com/
  20. Gingerich, Jon. “Advocacy Group Appoints Lobbyists in Fight for Trans Rights”. O’Dwyer’s.Odwyerpr.com. January 9, 2019. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://www.odwyerpr.com/story/public/11854/2019-01-09/advocacy-group-appoints-lobbyists-fight-for-trans-rights.html
  21. “Minutes of the Committee on Ethics and Elections”. Michigan House of Representatives. March 22, 2018. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://mirsnews.com/pdfs/committeemeetings/03-22-2018%20-%20House%20Elections%20and%20Ethics%20-%20Minutes.pdf
  22. Blair, Chad. “Minimum Wage And Marijuana: What To Expect In The 2019 Hawaii Legislature”. Honolulu Civil Beat. January 10, 2019. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://www.civilbeat.org/2019/01/minimum-wage-and-marijuana-what-to-expect-in-the-2019-hawaii-legislature/
  23. McLarty, Bri. “AVR: Small step with a big impact”. Civicnebraska.org. January 31, 2017. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://www.civicnebraska.org/avr-small-step-with-a-big-impact/
  24. “Let NY Vote Coalition Storms Albany for First-Ever Hearing on Automatic Voter Registration”. readMedia. Posted by Common Cause of New York. May 30, 2019. Accessed January 13, 2020. http://readme.readmedia.com/Let-NY-Vote-Coalition-Storms-Albany-for-First-Ever-Hearing-on-Automatic-Voter-Registration/16398278
  25. “Minutes of Meeting 2018 Regular Session”. State of Louisiana House Committee on House and Governmental Affairs. April 17, 2018.  Accessed January 13, 2020. http://house.louisiana.gov/H_CmteRecordRolCallVotes/Minutes/2018/H&G%20MINUTES%20041718.pdf
  26. Miller, Shannon. “Inquest to automatically register voters at DMV, permits that allow undocumented residents to drive prove a hang-up”. The Nevada Independent. October 31, 2019.  Accessed January 13, 2020. https://thenevadaindependent.com/article/in-quest-to-automatically-register-voters-at-dmv-permits-that-allow-undocumented-residents-to-drive-prove-a-hang-up
  27. Common Cause. Commoncause.org. “Our Work”. “Research and Reports”. “Delivering on Automatic Voter Registration’s Promise: Implementation Lessons from the States”. “Experts”.  June 1, 2019. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://www.commoncause.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/AVRWhitePaper_WEB.pdf
  28. “Video: How automated verification & registration works”. Movement Advancement Project. Lgbtmap.org. “Policy”. “Voting Policy”. “Video created by Center for Secure and Modern Elections”. Accessed January 13, 2020. http://www.lgbtmap.org/video-how-automated-verification-registration-works
  29. Center for Civic Design. Civicdesign.org. “About”. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://civicdesign.org/about/
  30. Funder’s Committee for Civic Participation. Funderscommittee.org. “The 2016 Elections + Nonpartisan Grantmaking”. “Speakers”. January 11, 2016. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://funderscommittee.org/2016-annual-report-table-of-contents/2016-virtual-discussions/the-2016-elections-nonpartisan-grantmaking/
  31. Election Sciences Reform and Administration Conference. Blogs.reed.edu. “Conference Agenda w/ Linked Presented Materials”. July 27, 2017.Accessed January 13, 2020. https://blogs.reed.edu/election-science/files/2017/07/ESRA_2017_Conference_Papers_For_Attendees.pdf
  32. “Tuning In & Turning Out Millennials are active but not voting; what’s stopping them and how can they make their voices count?” Common Cause. “Acknowledgments”. September 2016. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://selc.senate.ca.gov/sites/selc.senate.ca.gov/files/tuning-in_turning-out_common_cause_september_2016.pdf
  33. Sanford Nowlin. “Republican Elections Official Blasts Texas Bill That Would Make It a Felony to Incorrectly Fill Out a Voter Application.” May 7, 2019. Accessed June 17, 2022. https://www.sacurrent.com/news/republican-elections-official-blasts-texas-bill-that-would-make-it-a-felony-to-incorrectly-fill-out-a-voter-application-21175081
  34. McGaughy, Lauren. “Controversial Texas voting bill likely dead this year after failing to be set for debate”. Dallas Morning News. May 19, 2019.  Accessed January 13, 2020. https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2019/05/20/controversial-texas-voting-bill-likely-dead-this-year-after-failing-to-be-set-for-debate/
  35. Nowlin, Sanford. “Republican Elections Official Blasts Texas Bill That Would Make It a Felony to Incorrectly Fill Out a Voter Application”. San Antonio Current. May 7, 2019. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://www.sacurrent.com/the-daily/archives/2019/05/07/republican-elections-official-blasts-texas-bill-that-would-make-it-a-felony-to-incorrectly-fill-out-a-voter-application
  36. Powell, Adam. “Secretary of State to host voting rights tour in Selma”. Selma Times-Journal. May 6, 2019. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://www.selmatimesjournal.com/2019/05/06/secretary-of-state-to-host-voting-rights-tour-in-selma/
  37. “Home.” Civitas Public Affairs. Accessed November 29, 2021. https://civitaspublicaffairs.com/#our-clients.
  38. State of Louisiana v. Center for Technology and Civic Life, New Venture Fund, et al. Filed October 2, 2020. Accessed May 12, 2021. Original URL: https://lailluminator.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/2020.10.02-AG-Petition.pdf. Archived URL: https://www.influencewatch.org/app/uploads/2021/05/Louisiana-v-CTCL-New-Venture-Fund.-10.02.2020.pdf
  39. State of Louisiana v. Center for Technology and Civic Life, New Venture Fund, et al. Filed October 2, 2020. Accessed May 12, 2021. Original URL: https://lailluminator.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/2020.10.02-AG-Petition.pdf. Archived URL: https://www.influencewatch.org/app/uploads/2021/05/Louisiana-v-CTCL-New-Venture-Fund.-10.02.2020.pdf
  40. Sam Karlin. “Judge rules against Jeff Landry in suit against Zuckerberg-backed nonprofit over free election money.” The Baton Rouge Advocate. Oct. 26, 2020. Accessed May 12, 2021. https://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/news/politics/elections/article_52b60760-17a9-11eb-9999-ef2b2c1bffcb.html
  41. “State of Louisiana Versus Center for Tech and Civic Life, Et Al.. vs.” Justia Law. Accessed July 25, 2022. https://law.justia.com/cases/louisiana/third-circuit-court-of-appeal/2022/ca-0021-0670.html.
  42. Skinner, Victor. “Appeals Court Sides with Ag Landry in ‘Zuckerbucks’ Election Lawsuit.” The Center Square, April 4, 2022. https://www.thecentersquare.com/louisiana/appeals-court-sides-with-ag-landry-in-zuckerbucks-election-lawsuit/article_c622f588-b437-11ec-8260-6339773270d0.html.
  43. Cleveland, Margot. “Court Reinstates Lawsuit against Zuckerberg’s Election Meddling Group.” The Federalist, April 5, 2022. https://thefederalist.com/2022/04/05/court-reinstates-louisiana-ags-lawsuit-against-zuckerbergs-election-meddling-group/.
  44. Carroll, Michael. “Louisiana Lawsuit Challenging Zuckerberg-Funded Group’s Election Donations Gets Green Light.” Louisiana Record, July 15, 2022. https://louisianarecord.com/stories/628727629-louisiana-lawsuit-challenging-zuckerberg-funded-group-s-election-donations-gets-green-light.
  45. Markay, Lachlan. “Over 100 Left-Wing Groups Sourced to DC Dark Money Outfit”. Washington Free Beacon. October 22, 2015. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://freebeacon.com/issues/over-100-left-wing-groups-sourced-to-d-c-dark-money-outfit/
  46. The Bauman Foundation. Baumanfoundation.org. “Grantees”. “New Venture Fund”. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://www.baumanfoundation.org/grantee/119?order=amount&sort=desc&page=1
  47. Democracy Fund. Democracyfund.org. “Impact”. “Our investees”. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://www.democracyfund.org/portfolio
  48. Internal Revenue Service. IRS.gov. “Charities and nonprofits”. “Tax Exempt Organization Search”. Accessed May 12, 2021. https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/tax-exempt-organization-search
  49. “Grants Database.” The Joyce Foundation. Accessed November 23, 2021. https://www.joycefdn.org/grants-database?query=new%2Bventure%2Bfund.
  50. “Center for Secure and Modern Elections.” Blaustein Philanthropic Group, February 25, 2021. https://blaufund.org/center-for-secure-and-modern-elections/.
  51. Johnson, Theodore R., Laura Hecht-Felella, Eric Ruben, Rachel Levinson-Waldman, Michael Li, and Alia Nahra. “Governor Cuomo Signs Automatic Voter Registration into Law in New York.” Brennan Center for Justice, November 22, 2021. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/governor-cuomo-signs-automatic-voter-registration-law-new-york.
  52. Center for Secure and Modern Elections. Modernelections.org. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://modernelections.org/
  53. Internal Revenue Service. IRS.gov. “Charities and nonprofits”. “Tax Exempt Organization Search”. Accessed January 13, 2020.  https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/tax-exempt-organization-search
  54. Harvard Kennedy School. Harvard,edu. “Events”. “A Democracy Agenda: Conversations with Leaders in the Field [Session Four]”. “Speakers and Presenters” November 12, 2019.  Accessed January 13, 2020. https://www.hks.harvard.edu/events/democracy-agenda-conversations-leaders-field-session-four
  55. Vote at Home. Voteathome.org. “About”. “Circle of advisors members”. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://www.voteathome.org/about/
  56. “Jake Matilsky.” LinkedIn, Accessed June 27, 2023. https://www.linkedin.com/in/jake-matilsky-04613024
  57. Vote at Home. Voteathome.org. “About”. “Circle of advisors members”. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://www.voteathome.org/about/
  58. Data compiled from U.S. Department of Labor Office of Labor-Management Standards from annual reports filed by labor unions. Queries conducted October 2, 2019.
  59. Linkedin. “Jake Matilsky”. Accessed January 13, 2020.  https://www.linkedin.com/in/jake-matilsky-04613024
  60. Center For Responsive Politics. Opensecrets.org. “Donor lookup”. “Jacob Matilsky”. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://www.opensecrets.org/donor-lookup/results?name=Jacob+Matilsky
  61. “Sam Oliker-Friedland.” LinkedIn, Accessed June 27, 2023. https://www.linkedin.com/in/sam-oliker-friedland-6b557b153
  62. Wang, Hansi Lo. “Judge Says Administration Can’t Change Lawyers In Census Citizenship Question Case”. National Public Radio. July 7, 2019. Accessed January 13, 2020.  https://www.npr.org/2019/07/07/739369416/justice-department-changes-legal-team-behind-census-citizenship-question-case
  63. Miller, Shannon. “Inquest to automatically register voters at DMV, permits that allow undocumented residents to drive prove a hang-up”. The Nevada Independent. October 31, 2019.  Accessed January 13, 2020. https://thenevadaindependent.com/article/in-quest-to-automatically-register-voters-at-dmv-permits-that-allow-undocumented-residents-to-drive-prove-a-hang-up
  64. Fung, Brian. “Inside the Democratic party’s Hogwarts for digital wizardry.” Washington Post, July 8, 2014. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2014/07/08/inside-the-democratic-partys-hogwarts-for-digital-wizardry/
  65. “Our Team.” The Center for Tech and Civil Life. Accessed June 27, 2023. https://www.techandciviclife.org/team/
  66. Chapin, Doug. “ElectionlineWeekly ‘Exit Interview’ With John Lindback”. Election Academy. August 4, 2017. Accessed January 13, 2020.  https://editions.lib.umn.edu/electionacademy/2017/08/04/electionlineweekly-exit-interview-with-john-lindback/
  67. “We’re Still Asking: What Is Automatic Voter Registration? Just improved Motor-Voter?” National Conference of State Legislatures. Ncsl.org. May, 2019.  Accessed January 13, 2020. https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/the-canvass-may-2019.aspx
  See an error? Let us know!