Take Back the Court

Take Back the Court Foundation (also known as Take Back the Court) is a left-of-center advocacy group that campaigns for Congress to add seats to the United States Supreme Court and appoint justices favorable to liberal policy priorities. The organization was founded in 2018 by political scientist Aaron Belkin and LGBT activist Kate Kendell in direct response to the Supreme Court appointments made during the first Trump administration. The group argues that the Senate’s decision not to vote on President Barack Obama’s 2016 nominee, Merrick Garland, constituted Republicans “steal[ing] a seat” on the Court, and contends that the appropriate remedy is for a Democratic-controlled Congress to legislatively expand the Court to 13 or more justices. Take Back the Court Foundation operates as a 501(c)(3) educational and research entity, while its affiliated 501(c)(4) arm, the Take Back the Court Action Fund, handles direct lobbying and electoral advocacy. 1 2 3 4

At-A-Glance

Ideological Alignment: Left of Center
Formation:

2019

President:

Sarah Lipton-Lubet

Location: San Francisco, CA View on map
Tax ID: 84-2145297
Most Recent Filing: 2024
Budget (2024): Assets: $566,400 Revenue: $608,175 Expenses: $626,176

Contents

    Background

    Aaron Belkin founded Take Back the Court in 2018, describing the moment that the Republican-controlled Senate declined to hold a confirmation vote on President Barack Obama’s 2016 Supreme Court nominee, then-Judge Merrick Garland, as the catalyst for launching the organization. At the time of its founding, Belkin stated that no members of Congress and no organizations in the United States publicly backed Supreme Court expansion; he credited the organization with helping shift that environment significantly in subsequent years. 2 5

    Belkin previously worked for 24 years as the founding director of the Palm Center, a San Francisco-based LGBT advocacy group. The Palm Center is credited with influencing the repeal of the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy and the 2016 lifting of the ban on transgender service members. Belkin is also a professor of political science at San Francisco State University. 5 6

    Kate Kendell, the organization’s co-founder, had served as executive director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights, an LGBT advocacy group that advances left-wing social policy through litigation and lobbying, and previously worked the Southern Poverty Law Center and the California Endowment. As of 2026 she was the CEO of the Gill Foundation. 7 8

    Activities

    Take Back the Court Foundation has positioned court expansion, adding four seats to the Supreme Court to be filled by a Democratic president, as its central goal. The group produced research arguing that the Court’s conservative majority posed threats to climate change legislation, abortion access, labor union interests, and election administration. Publications released under the organization’s banner include reports titled “Stolen Supreme Court Threatens to Undo Decades of Environmental Progress,” “The Supreme Court May Greenlight a Fringe Scheme That Threatens the Core of Democracy,” and “Supreme Court Repeals the 20th Century. 3 9

    Judiciary Act

    Take Back the Court became one of the most vocal outside advocates for the Judiciary Act of 2021, proposed legislation introduced by Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) and Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) that would have expanded the Supreme Court from nine to 13 justices, enabling then-President Joe Biden to immediately nominate and the Democratic-controlled Senate to confirm four new, presumably liberal, justices. The legislation did not advance; then-President Biden, who had previously opposed court-packing, announced a presidential commission to study changes to the court rather than immediately endorsing expansion. 10 11 5

    By the time Belkin departed from the organization in late 2022, Take Back the Court reported that more than 60 members of Congress and over 130 organizations had pledged support for court expansion, and claimed majority public support for the idea in polling. 12

    The Judiciary Act was reintroduced in 2023 and did not advance with Republicans in control of the U.S. House of Representatives. The legislation was not introduced in 2025 after Republican Donald Trump returned to the presidency. 13 14

    Coalition Work

    Take Back the Court has operated in coalition with other left-wing judicial advocacy organizations. In January 2021, it joined the “Unrig the Courts” coalition alongside Demand Justice, Indivisible, and others to press then-President Biden to support court expansion. In 2023, the group became part of Just Majority, an umbrella coalition of more than 40 left-wing organizations that promoted the Judiciary Act. 15 16

    Polling

    Take Back the Court has also conducted several polls on voter opinions of the Supreme Court. One January 2019 poll revealed that partisan priming has significant effects on low-information voters’ opinions of Supreme Court justices, and that voters who are given the partisan label of the President who appointed Supreme Court justices report lower overall faith in the Supreme Court’s neutrality. 17

    A May 2019 Take Back the Court messaging poll argues that after being told that Republican business interests resulted in the appointment of President Trump’s Supreme Court Justices, a majority of Democrats favor Court expansion. Only 24 percent of voters who were not primed with any politically charged information supported adding seats to the Supreme Court. 18

    Take Back the Court has opposed the concept of an independent judiciary, with director Aaron Belkin telling the Daily Signal that there can be no “objective” court, and that it is healthy for the public to see a political dimension to justice. Belkin argued in 2019 that when Democrats gained control of government once again, they should expand the court to have as many additional seats as justices President Trump was able to appoint because he “acquired the presidency illegitimately.” 19

    Leadership

    As of 2026, Sarah Lipton-Lubet was the president of Take Back the Court, a position she held since 2023 when she replaced founder Aaron Belkin. She was previously executive director of the group and has worked for left-of-center advocacy groups including the National Partnership for Women and Families, the American Civil Liberties Union, and the Center for Reproductive Rights. 20

    Financial Statistics

    Total Assets

    Total Revenue

    Total Expenses

    YearTotal AssetsTotal RevenueTotal ExpensesFiling
    2024 $566,400 $608,175 $626,176 View
    2023 $589,482 $752,890 $865,832 View
    2022 $703,525 $1,212,123 $1,220,823 View
    2021 $723,440 $1,187,922 $717,953 View

    Revenue Detail

    Expenses Detail

    Employee Compensation

    • Number of Employees: 3

    Highest Earning Employees

    EmployeeTitleTotal Compensation
    Sarah Lipton-LubetPresident$164,122

    Grant Activity

    All-time grants received statistics from Candid dataset:

    • Total Grant Value: $3,853,528
    • Number of Grants: 54
    • Number of Funders: 27

    Selection of highest value grants received from the last seven years:

    AmountYearFunderSubject
    $375,0002024 Wellspring Philanthropic FundGENERAL OPERATING SUPPORT
    $330,0002022 San Francisco FoundationADVISED – FOR GENERAL OPERATING SUPPORT. ADVISED – FOR GENERAL SUPPORT. ADVISED – TO EXTEND A 1:1 FUNDRAISING CHALLENGE, MATCHING DONATIONS UP TO $50,000 FOR THE PERIOD JAN 1, 2022 THROUGH JULY 31, 2022.
    $300,0002021 San Francisco FoundationADVISED – FOR GENERAL OPERATING SUPPORT.
    $250,0002023 Wellspring Philanthropic FundGENERAL OPERATING SUPPORT
    $250,0002022 Wellspring Philanthropic FundOPERATING SUPPORT
    $250,0002021 Wellspring Philanthropic FundOPERATING SUPPORT
    $250,0002020 Wellspring Philanthropic FundOperating support
    $200,0002022 Bny Mellon Charitable Gift Fund C/o Bny Mellon NaTO FURTHER THE ORGANIZATION'S EXEMPT PURPOSE
    $150,0002023 Open Society Action Fundto support the grantee's social welfare activities
    $150,0002022 Merle Chambers FundGENERAL SUPPORT
    $140,0002021 Bny Mellon Charitable Gift Fund C/o Bny Mellon NaTO FURTHER THE ORGANIZATION'S EXEMPT PURPOSE
    $100,0002024 Merle Chambers FundGENERAL SUPPORT (MULTI-YEAR)
    $100,0002023 Merle Chambers FundGENERAL SUPPORT (MULTI-YEAR)
    $100,0002020 Merle Chambers FundGeneral Support
    $100,0002020 The Bessemer Giving Fund C/o Bessemer Trust Company TrusteeGENERAL SUPPORT
    $75,0002022 National Philanthropic TrustPUBLIC, SOCIETAL BENEFIT
    $50,0002023 San Francisco FoundationADVISED – FOR RESEARCHING ATTITUDES REGARDING COURT EXPANSION AMONG POLITICAL MODERATES.
    $50,0002022 Jewish Federation Bay AreaCIVIL RIGHTS/SOCIAL ACTION/ADVOCACY
    $50,0002020 Evelyn and Walter Haas Jr FundTO EDUCATE THE PUBLIC ABOUT THE NEED TO MODERNIZE THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY
    $50,0002023 Jewish Federation Bay AreaCIVIL RIGHTS/SOCIAL ACTION/ADVOCACY
    $50,0002023 National Philanthropic TrustPUBLIC, SOCIETAL BENEFIT
    $35,7012020 Palm CenterSee Part IV
    $30,0002023 Horizons FoundationMATCHING GRANT
    $27,0002021 Horizons FoundationUNRESTRICTED
    $25,0002024 Lebowitz-Aberly Family FoundationGENERAL FUND

    All-time grants given statistics from Candid dataset:

    • Total Grant Value: $130,000
    • Number of Grants: 1
    • Number of Recipients: 1

    Selection of highest value grants given from the last seven years:

    AmountYearFunderSubject
    $130,0002020 Take Back the Court Action FundSupport research&program(See Sch R)

    References

    1. “Mission.” Take Back the Court Foundation. Accessed May 19, 2026. https://www.takebackthecourtfoundation.org/mission
    2. Belkin, Aaron. “The urgent need for court expansion.” SCOTUSblog. March 2021. Accessed May 19, 2026. https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/03/the-urgent-need-for-court-expansion/
    3. “Take Back the Court.” Take Back the Court Foundation. Accessed May 19, 2026. https://www.takebackthecourtfoundation.org
    4. Statement and Designation by Foreign Corporation: Take Back the Court Action Fund.” California Secretary of State. Filed November 23, 2020. Accessed May 19, 2026. https://businesssearch.sos.ca.gov/Document/RetrievePDF?Id=04668239-29423048
    5. “Aaron Belkin.” San Francisco State University Department of Political Science. Accessed May 19, 2026. https://politicalscience.sfsu.edu/people/aaron-belkin
    6. “Aaron Belkin.” AaronBelkin.org. Accessed May 19, 2026. https://aaronbelkin.org
    7. Kendell, Kate. “The Court’s Been Packed. Now What?” Ms. Magazine. September 25, 2020. Accessed May 19, 2026. https://msmagazine.com/2020/09/25/court-expansion-expand-the-supreme-court/
    8. “Kate Kendall.” LinkedIn. Accessed May 19, 2026. https://www.linkedin.com/in/katekendell/
    9. “Studies.” Take Back the Court Action Fund. Accessed May 19, 2026. https://www.takebackthecourt.today/studies
    10. Segers, Grace. “Democrats to introduce legislation to expand Supreme Court from 9 to 13 justices.” NBC News. April 15, 2021. Accessed May 19, 2026. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/democrats-introduce-bill-expand-supreme-court-9-13-justices-n1264132
    11. Tillman, Zoë. “Biden Was Against Packing The Supreme Court. A New Progressive Group Wants To Change His Mind.” BuzzFeed News. January 28, 2021. Accessed May 19, 2026. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetillman/biden-supreme-court-packing-group-unrig-the-courts
    12. “Press Release: Take Back the Court Announces Leadership Transition.” Take Back the Court Action Fund. January 17, 2022. Accessed May 19, 2026. https://www.takebackthecourt.today/press-release-take-back-the-court-announces-leadership-transition
    13. “Rep. Johnson, Sen. Markey Announce Legislation to Expand Supreme Court, Restore its Legitimacy alongside Senator Smith, Reps. Schiff and Bush.” Congressman Hank Johnson. May 16, 2023. Accessed May 19, 2026. https://hankjohnson.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-johnson-sen-markey-announce-legislation-expand-supreme-court
    15. Tillman, Zoë. “Biden Was Against Packing the Supreme Court. A New Progressive Group Wants to Change His Mind.” BuzzFeed News. January 28, 2021. Accessed May 19, 2026. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetillman/biden-supreme-court-packing-group-unrig-the-courts
    16. Betz, Bradford. “The disappearing court packers.” Capital Research Center. August 8, 2025. Accessed May 19, 2026. https://capitalresearch.org/article/the-disappearing-court-packers/
    17. “Partisan Priming has Significant Effects on Voters’ Opinions of Justices.” Take Back the Court. January 29, 2019. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5ce33e8da6bbec0001ea9543/t/5cffba62dab73e000160983c/1560263268095/Partisan+priming.pdf
    18. “Democratic Voters Approve of Court Expansion.” Take Back the Court. Accessed November 6, 2019. https://www.takebackthecourt.today/democratic-voters-approve-of-court-expansion.
    19. Lucas, Fred. “Left Targets High Court With ‘Packing’ Threat, Activist Nominees ‘Shortlist’.” The Daily Signal, October 17, 2019. https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/10/16/the-left-targets-supreme-court-with-packing-threat-shortlist-of-activist-nominees/.
    20. “Our Leadership.” Take Back the Court. Accessed May 19, 2026. https://www.takebackthecourt.today/leadership