Delaware Riverkeeper Network

The organization was established in 1988 and is a member of the international Waterkeeper Alliance ² led by controversial activist Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. ³ The organization works in four states with the Delaware River watershed: Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware and New York. ⁴ Delaware Riverkeeper has been opposed to the use of nuclear energy. ⁵

The organization is known for both getting government grants and for suing government agencies. ⁶

Leadership

Maya K. van Rossum is the CEO of the organization. She is the author of The Green Amendment: Securing Our Right to a Healthy Environment, a manifesto supporting the Delaware Riverkeeper campaign to add “environmental rights” amendments to state constitutions and the U.S. Constitution. ⁷ Van Rossum has been with the organization since 1996. ¹

Chari Towne is the Delaware Riverkeeper executive director. Tracey Carluccio is the deputy director. Mary Ellen Noble is the associate director. Tim White is the chief innovation officer. Deanna Tanner is a senior attorney. Faith Zerbe is the Water Watch director. Erik Silldorff is the restoration director. ⁸

Policy Agenda

Delaware Riverkeeper Network campaigns for so-called “Green Amendments” for “inalienable rights to pure water, clean air, a stable climate and healthy environments.” The organization also seeks, “self-executing, environmental rights amendments in the Bill of Rights section of every state constitution across the U.S. and ultimately at the federal level.” It runs the Green Amendments for the Generation campaign to promote their adoption. ⁹

Opposition to Natural Gas Production

The organization opposes natural gas development in the Delaware River. ¹⁰

Although the organization claims to limit its focus to issues affecting the Delaware River watershed, it has expanded into other environmental matters. In the Middlesex Township, 200 miles outside the Delaware River Basin, the organization opposed a natural gas project that reportedly had no clear connection to the river. ¹¹

Opposition to Nuclear Energy

In May of 2021, Delaware Riverkeeper was one of 715 groups and businesses listed as a co-signer on a letter to the leadership of the U.S. House and Senate that referred to nuclear energy as a “dirty” form of energy production and a “significant” source of pollution. The letter asked federal lawmakers to reduce carbon emissions by creating a “renewable electricity standard” that promoted production of weather dependent power sources such as wind turbines and solar panels, but did not promote low carbon natural gas and zero carbon nuclear energy. ⁵

Nuclear power plants produce no carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gas emissions, and as of 2021 accounted for 19 percent of American electricity production—the largest source of zero carbon electricity in the United States. ¹² An October 2018 proposal from The Nature Conservancy noted that zero-carbon nuclear plants produced 7.8 percent of total world energy output and recommended reducing carbon emissions by increasing nuclear capacity to 33 percent of total world energy output. ¹³

Delaware Riverkeeper was one of more than 600 co-signing organizations on a January 2019 open letter to Congress titled “Legislation to Address the Urgent Threat of Climate Change.” The signatories declared their support for new laws to bring about “100 percent decarbonization” of the transportation sector but denounced nuclear power as an example of “dirty energy” that should not be included in any legislation promoting the use of so-called “renewable energy.” ¹⁴

Revenue Sources

In 2014 the organization reportedly got $104,834 in government grants. ⁶

Among the donors to the organization are the environmentalist-aligned Claneil Foundation, which gave a three-year $45,000 grant from 2017 to 2020. ¹⁵

The Berks County Community Foundation in Pennsylvania also contributed to the Delaware Riverkeeper Network. ¹⁶

Other major donors to the organization included the left-leaning William Penn Foundation, the Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation, the Wallace Research Foundation, and the Woodtiger Fund. ⁶

Delaware Riverkeeper’s 2014 tax documents show that more than half of the group’s expenses, $1.18 million, were spent on salaries. ⁶

Litigation

Delaware Riverkeeper has an active litigation program and has sued numerous federal agencies. The organization sued the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in 2014, 2016 and 2017, losing each case. FERC approves energy projects, such as drilling and pipeline applications, and DRN sued to stop the projects. Among the arguments used in the lawsuits allege that FERC has a conflict of interest because it if funded in part through fees paid by the energy companies. ⁶

The DRN has sued the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for approving a liquified natural gas project. ¹⁷ The group has also sued the Environmental Protection Agency to try to push the agency to take action. ¹⁸

The Delaware Riverkeeper Network lost a 2017 case to Soil Safe, a soil recycling company. U.S. District Judge Renee Marie Bumb seemed to question the motivations of the lawsuit in her 80 page opinion. DRN claimed Soil Safe was contaminating the river. In the course of the case, the defendants argued a consultant with a competitor company, Clean Earth, played a role in the genesis of lawsuit. An anonymous gift of $205,000 was made to the DRN at about the time the litigation began. Though not the crux of the ruling, Judge Bumb reportedly took it seriously enough to mention in the opinion. ¹¹

–