Ohio Public Interest Research Group (Ohio PIRG) Citizen Lobby
Ohio Public Interest Research Group Citizen Lobby (Ohio PIRG) is the advocacy arm of the Ohio Public Interest Research Group Education Fund based in Columbus, Ohio. It is the Ohio state affiliate of the U.S. Public Interest Research Group (US-PIRG) and the successor organization to the Ohio Public Interest Research Group, Inc.
Contents
The Ohio PIRG Citizen Lobby works in conjunction with other state PIRGs and the U.S. PIRG to promote left-of-center policies on issues such as public health, environmentalism, economics, voting, and health care.
Founding and History
The first public interest research groups (PIRGs) were founded in 1970 in Oregon and Minnesota as student action groups, which were documented by Ralph Nader and Donald Ross in their 1971 book Action for Change: A Student’s Manual for Public Interest Organizing. 1 Action for Change inspired the formation of PIRGs across the country, including the Ohio Public Interest Research Group, Inc. in 1975. 2
In 2002, the Ohio PIRG Education Fund was founded to manage the education aspects of the PIRG, 3 and in 2004 the Ohio PIRG Citizen Lobby was formed to direct activism and lobbying efforts. 4 The Citizen Lobby officially replaced Ohio PIRG, Inc. in 2013 when the latter disbanded. 2
Activism and Lawsuits
The Ohio PIRG lists dozens of policy proposals for which it advocates under 11 different areas, including Covid-19, voting issues, environmental issues, higher education, and health care. It consistently argues for left of center positions. 5
On Covid-19, the group links to the U.S. PIRG website, which argues for increased masking and vaccination mandates and opposes states lifting restrictions. 6 Other policy proposals include government-provided broadband internet, overturning Citizens United v. FEC, providing taxpayer funds to candidates for office, automatic voter registration, and ending subsidies for the domestic oil and natural gas industry. 5
Ohio PIRG also has a history of filing lawsuits against businesses and government agencies in order to require more strict environmental controls. In 1996, Ohio PIRG Inc. sued Laidlaw Environmental Services, alleging that they had failed to properly dispose of pollutants. 7 This case was settled out of court and never fully decided. Similarly, in 2004, Ohio PIRG Inc. sued the Environmental Protection Agency, alleging that it failed to provide a notice of deficiency to the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency over its implementation of the Clean Air Act. The U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals decided against the Ohio PIRG on the grounds that agencies have discretion in issuing notices of deficiency under the statute. 8
Financial Statistics
Total Assets
Total Revenue
Total Expenses
Revenue Detail
Expenses Detail
Grant Activity
All-time grants received statistics from Candid dataset:
- Total Grant Value: $100
- Number of Grants: 1
- Number of Funders: 1