The Ocean Foundation (TOF) is a left-of-center fiscal sponsorship and grantmaking organization that focuses on environmental issues, especially those related to the world’s oceans. Founded in 2001, TOF has received private and governmental funding, and also offers corporate partnerships, drawing attention to the public relations face-lift it can bestow: “improved brand lift, increased sales, engaged employees, [and] a boost in customer loyalty[.]” 1
The Ocean Foundation is a partner of the United Nations’ Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission. It also began a fund to support the United Nations’ “Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development” which runs from 2021 to 2030. 2
The Ocean Foundation stated that it would incorporate a “Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Justice lens”into every aspect of its environmentalism by incorporating DEIJ staff training and applying these principles to its recruitment of staff and board membership. TOF’s “Diversity/Equity/Inclusion/Justice (DEIJ)” project also included an announcement that it would start distributing a monthly newsletter to focus on this facet of its environmental advocacy. TOF also participated in the environmental nonprofit monitoring group Green 2.0’s 2021 “Report Card on Diversity,” which tracked equity outcomes in nonprofits that chose to participate by self-reporting. 4
Pride 2022
In June 2022, TOF published a blog post decrying a supposed “critical lack of diversity” in science technology engineering and math (STEM) fields. The article, “Pride 2022: Putting LGBTQ+ Voices on Deck,” highlights an executive order signed by President Joe Biden earlier that month which focused on LGBT issue areas such as ending the ban on transgender military personnel and addressing the high suicide rate among these groups. 5
Marine Pathways Internship
In March 2019, TOF announced the Marine Pathways Internship Program, a flexible, paid internship offer with special invitation extended to “women, people of color, people with disabilities, veterans, LGBTQ+, and individuals with diverse backgrounds.” 6
Advocacy
International Ocean Acidification Initiative
In 2003, The Ocean Foundation spearheaded the International Ocean Acidification Initiative (IOAI) to monitor the increase in global oceanic acidity allegedly caused by an increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide. This project spun off the Global Ocean Acidification Observation Network (GOA-ON), a brainchild of the 2012 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, and eventually spawned the Friends of the Global Ocean Acidification Observation Network Fund to financially sustain a global network of scientific research in this field. This project is supported by the U.S. State Department, which expanded the program to include monitoring in several African nations including Mozambique and South Africa. The State Department then began a similar project in 2016, spearheading the Ocean Acidification Monitoring and Mitigation (OAMM) program, which focuses on similar research in Latin America and the Pacific Islands. 7
Blue Resilience Initiative
In 2022, TOF launched the Blue Resilience Initiative (BRI), pledging to give $8 million over a three-year period toward ocean conservancy projects. Partnering with private sector groups such as Grogenics, several non-governmental organizations of Cuba and Puerto Rico, and the University of Havana, this project aims to renovate coral and mangrove forests, as well as developing invasive sargassum sea grasses into organic compost. 8
Grantees
The Ocean Foundation gave nearly $1.2 million in grants throughout its fiscal year 2022. Grants included $142,000 to the Resiliencia Azul (Blue Resilience) project in Mexico, which aims at creating “blue carbon” markets by planting marine seagrasses to reduce carbon emissions, and the implementation of carbon tax and credit systems. The Great Marsh Blue Carbon Feasibility Study received $50,000, which will investigate the feasibility of carbon-offset planting in Massachusetts wetlands. Grants were also given to social influence campaigns, such as $20,000 for the Wildland Conservation Project to build support among African youth for the United Nations’ “30×30” sustainable development goals, and a small set of donations given to local groups surrounding the Chesapeake Bay for a campaign to increase awareness of marine plant importance among recreational boaters. 9
Leadership
Mark J. Spalding is the president of the Ocean Foundation and is an ocean investment advisor to climate tech group Green Swan Partners LLC. He is the former executive director of the environmental advocacy groups Loreto Bay Foundation and the St. Kitts Foundation, and is a senior fellow at Middlebury Institute of International Studies’ Center for the Blue Economy. Spalding is also former CEO of the marine food sustainability group SeaWeb. 1011
Harvest strategies are pre-agreed rules that govern how fisheries will be managed based on the status of the targeted fish population, bycatch considerations, socioeconomics, or other management objectives. Rather than campaigning for sustainable catch limits year after year, TOF’s International Fisheries Conservation Project (IFC) is advocating for long-term harvest strategies, thereby expanding our impact beyond individual negotiation sessions and preventing overfishing over decades rather than years. In 2015, IFC took a leading role in beginning to transition the management of international fisheries to harvest strategies. This modern approach to management requires governments and relevant stakeholders to pre-agree to long-term objectives for a fishery and to use a science-based methodology (called management strategy evaluation, or MSE) to determine which actions to take, like setting catch limits, to meet those agreed objectives. Harvest strategies are akin to agreeing to the rules before playing the game, making management more transparent, inclusive, and less politicized. MSE is a highly technical modelling approach. It improves upon traditional fisheries stock assessment by better accounting for the uncertainties inherent in fish biology, the ocean ecosystem and fishery dynamics, allowing selection of the harvest strategy likely to meet objectives regardless of which potential future turns out to be correct. This is in contrast to stock assessments, which base management advice on one best guess of the future situation. MSE testing operates in a loop, which allows evaluation of adaptive management and changing conditions, especially vital in the context of climate change, and much more realistic than the linear projections used in stock assessment. When we started our work, only one bluefin tuna species out of the approximately 130 actively managed international fish stocks was managed through a harvest strategy. As a result of TOF’s activities at nine different regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs) over the past decade, more than 20% of all actively managed international fisheries now have harvest strategies either adopted or scheduled for adoption within the next 18 months. We have mostly focused our efforts to date at the tuna RFMOs, and as of July 2024, more than half of all tuna catch is managed under a system with an adopted harvest strategy. A 2024 report by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization attributed the recent successes in sustainable tuna management to the adoption of harvest strategies for many tuna populations. In the last few years, we have built upon our accomplishments at the tuna RFMOs and have started campaigning more purposely for the adoption of harvest strategies for a wider variety of species.
The GEM-in-a-Box project offers a low-cost, easy-to-use kit to detect and monitor eutrophication-a process in which an overabundance of nutrients leads to excessive plant and algae growth and can lead to ocean acidification and harm marine life