Center for Humane Technology

Center for Humane Technology (CHT), formerly known as Time Well Spent, is a group that supports restrictions on social media to combat supposed political extremism and the negative psychological effects of internet usage. CHT considers the current form of social media to be a major societal problem that needs to be addressed through a combination of government regulation, corporate responsibility, and consumer activism. 1

At-A-Glance

Issue Areas: Tech Policy
Location:

San Fransisco, CA

President:

Tristan Harris

Location: San Francisco, CA View on map
Tax ID: 82-3492182
Most Recent Filing: 2025
Budget (2025): Assets: $6,142,722 Revenue: $5,785,317 Expenses: $5,807,076

Contents

    The organization was founded and is largely staffed by former employees of major technology companies. Major left-of-center foundations including George Soros’s Open Society Foundations, Pierre Omidyar’s Omidyar Network, and the Ford Foundation have supported CHT. 2

    History

    Center for Humane Technology credits its origin to co-founder and president Tristan Harris, who originally founded Time Well Spent as an unofficial organization in 2013. That year, while Harris was working as a design ethicist at Google, he gave a presentation arguing that Google and other websites should avoid using design methods which exploit deficiencies in user attention spans. Harris would appear on “60 Minutes” and give his own TED Talk over the following years. In 2018, Harris co-founded CHT as a 501(c)(3) with entrepreneur Aza Raskin and technologist Randima Fernando. 3

    For instance, social media notifications make the “trivial seem urgent” by using signals usually reserved for important matters (bells, alarms, etc.) to signal ordinary developments (ex. “likes” or friend requests), and social media encourages constant social comparisons through artificially crafted presentations of individuals. Such design elements increase engagement and revenue for social media companies, but according to some research, can cause depression, anxiety, and other psychological problems in users. “Extremist content” is allegedly particularly effective at driving engagement. 1

    Social Media Policy Advocacy

    Center for Humane Technology claims credit for inducing numerous social media and technology companies to introduce user interface changes designed to limit the harms of their use. In 2018, Facebook altered its News Feed algorithm to promote higher quality content, YouTube added “time watched” and “take a break” notifications, Instagram added an “all caught up” notification, and Apple added app time limits and parental controls. 4

    CHT is currently organizing a petition for Facebook to implement a new two-level sharing limit, meaning that Facebook posts can only be shared by individuals who are two degrees of separation from the original poster. Theoretically, this reform will prevent the spread of extremist ideas which tend to proliferate on social media, while retaining a sufficient level of freedom of speech. 5

    Center for Humane Technology supports a larger role for the government in regulating online speech and social media companies. The group opposes many online privacy laws on the grounds that they are too complex for most individuals to understand, and they tend to ignore supposed “power dynamics” and “asymmetries” between individuals and corporations that render consent meaningless. 6

    The group supports anti-trust legislation, both to encourage consumer choice and to consider broader social issues such as data protection. 6

    The group advocates for bans or moratoriums on certain technologies (such as facial recognition software) until sufficient research can be done to ascertain their long-term social impacts. 6

    The group opposes Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which prevents websites from being legally treated as publishers of information posted on their website by users, thereby protecting the website from third-party-induced liability. CHT argues that Section 230 doesn’t account for the harms imposed by free speech on other third parties, and therefore website hosts of speech should be responsible for some degree of speech management. 6

    The Social Dilemma

    In 2020, Center for Humane Technology co-founders Tristan Harris, Aza Raskin, and Randima Fernando appeared in the Netflix documentary, The Social Dilemma. The documentary, which was strongly informed by CHT’s beliefs, argued for government regulation of social media companies. 7

    Funding

    Center for Humane Technology receives funding from numerous left-of-center nonprofits, including the Open Society Foundations, the Omidyar Network, the Craig Newmark Foundation, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the Silicon Valley Community Foundation, the Knight Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Pritzker Family Foundation, and the Pritzker Innovation Fund. 2

    Financial Statistics

    Total Assets

    Total Revenue

    Total Expenses

    YearTotal AssetsTotal RevenueTotal ExpensesFiling
    2025 $6,142,722 $5,785,317 $5,807,076 View
    2024 $6,174,703 $3,581,637 $6,329,475 View
    2023 $8,895,282 $9,457,658 $3,319,704 View
    2022 $2,666,587 $2,332,710 $3,358,006 View
    2021 $3,724,544 $3,495,036 $3,027,848 View
    2020 $3,483,822 $5,246,727 $3,395,097 View

    Prior year filings: 2019, 2018

    Revenue Detail

    Expenses Detail

    Employee Compensation

    • Number of Employees: 22

    Highest Earning Employees

    EmployeeTitleTotal Compensation
    Daniel BarcayExecutive Dir.$290,016
    Tristan HarrisPresident$259,434
    Julie GuiradoCOO$104,622
    Maria BridgeCOO$103,478

    Grant Activity

    All-time grants received statistics from Candid dataset:

    • Total Grant Value: $16,547,209
    • Number of Grants: 144
    • Number of Funders: 76

    Selection of highest value grants received from the last seven years:

    AmountYearFunderSubject
    $1,000,0002023 Lavin Family FoundationSCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
    $1,000,0002020 Foundation to Promote Open Societyto provide general support
    $603,9502020 Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundFor grant recipient's exempt purposes
    $600,0002025 The David and Lucile Packard Foundationfor general support ($450,000), and project support ($150,000) for the Interventions Map Project to highlight promising interventions that could shift the trajectory of technology development and deployment toward more humane outcomes
    $600,0002025 The David and Lucile Packard Foundationfor general support ($450,000), and project support ($150,000) for the Interventions Map Project to highlight promising interventions that could shift the trajectory of technology development and deployment toward more humane outcomes
    $512,9502023 Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundFor grant recipient's exempt purposes
    $500,0002023 National Philanthropic TrustPUBLIC, SOCIETAL BENEFIT
    $500,0002023 Silicon Valley Community Foundation
    $500,0002022 Silicon Valley Community Foundation
    $500,0002022 Silicon Valley Community FoundationSciences
    $500,0002020 Silicon Valley Community Foundation
    $500,0002020 Craig Newmark FoundationGENERAL PURPOSES
    $500,0002020 The Ford FoundationGeneral support to catalyze a rapid, coordinated change among technology companies through public advocacy, the development of ethical design standards, design education, and policy recommendations
    $472,0002021 Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundFor grant recipient's exempt purposes
    $470,5002024 Donor Advised Charitable Giving, Inc.PUBLIC, SOCIETAL BENEFIT
    $400,0002023 Oregon Community FoundationScience Technology Math
    $400,0002021 Omidyar Network Fund, Inc.General operating support
    $400,0002020 Omidyar Network Fund, Inc.General operating support
    $312,7502022 Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundFor grant recipient's exempt purposes
    $300,0002023 The Porticus North America Foundation F/k/a the Humanitas FoundationCORE MISSION SUPPORT AND THE AI DILEMMA.
    $252,9122023 Silicon Valley Community Foundation
    $225,0002024 National Philanthropic TrustPUBLIC, SOCIETAL BENEFIT
    $200,0002023 Charities Aid Foundation of AmericaCHARITABLE DONATION
    $200,0002021 Craig Newmark FoundationGENERAL PURPOSE
    $170,0002021 Marin Community FoundationEDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS SUPPORT

    All-time grants given statistics from Candid dataset:

    • Total Grant Value: $370,000
    • Number of Grants: 3
    • Number of Recipients: 3

    Selection of highest value grants given from the last seven years:

    AmountYearFunderSubject
    $220,0002024 Hopewell FundLights on Lab
    $75,0002024 Campaign for Accountability IncLegal advocacy
    $75,0002024 Mothers Against Media AddictionGet Media Savvy

    References

    1. “How Social Media Hacks Our Brains.” Center for Humane Technology. Accessed October 15, 2021. https://www.humanetech.com/brain-science.
    2. “Thank You To Our Generous Lead Supporters.” Center for Humane Technology. Accessed October 15, 2021. https://www.humanetech.com/who-we-are#our-story.
    3. “Who We Are.” Center for Humane Technology. Accessed October 15, 2021. https://www.humanetech.com/who-we-are#our-story. Theory of Social Media First popularized by co-founder and president Tristan Harris, Center for Humane Technology promotes scientific findings which argue that social media algorithms are exploiting natural cognitive biases to drive engagement, often at the expense of the mental wellbeing of users. [note] “How Social Media Hacks Our Brains.” Center for Humane Technology. Accessed October 15, 2021. https://www.humanetech.com/brain-science.
    4. “Who We Are.” Center for Humane Technology. Accessed October 15, 2021. https://www.humanetech.com/who-we-are#our-story.
    5. “Pressure Facebook to be #OneClickSafer.” Center for Humane Technology. Accessed October 15, 2021. https://www.humanetech.com/oneclicksafer.
    6. “Policy Principles. Center for Humane Technology. Accessed October 15, 2021. https://www.humanetech.com/policy-principles.
    7. “The Social Dilemma.” IMDB. Accessed October 15, 2021. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11464826/.