Non-profit

Catholics for Choice

Logo of Catholics for Choice . (link)
Location:

WASHINGTON, DC

Tax ID:

52-1154418

Tax-Exempt Status:

501(c)(3)

Budget (2023):

Revenue: $2,704,544
Expenses: $3,213,999
Assets: $14,891,745

Formation:

1973

Executive Director:

Jon O’Brien

Board Chair:

Daniel A. Dombrowski

Contact InfluenceWatch with suggested edits or tips for additional profiles.

Catholics for Choice (CFC) is a pro-abortion advocacy group of self-identified Catholics based in Washington, D.C., who assert, contrary to the Magisterium (teaching authority) of the Roman Catholic Church, that “the Catholic tradition supports a woman’s moral and legal right to follow her conscience in matters of sexuality and reproductive health,” namely abortion.1 The group takes an extremist pro-abortion position, circulating a petition arguing that “Public funding for abortion is a Catholic social justice value.”2

Formed in 1973 as a 501(c)(4) lobbying group in New York City by members of a local chapter of the feminist organization National Organization for Women (NOW), the group was named Catholics for a Free Choice until 2007.3

Claiming to be “part of the great majority of the faithful” who have chosen to embrace a “Catholic alternative” to “the dictates of the Vatican on a number of moral issues,”4 the CFC supports even late-term abortions,5 does not recognize the authority of the Church on abortion or contraception, and holds that “every individual must follow his or her own conscience.”67

Since the group’s inception, CFC’s publicity efforts have been deliberately antagonistic toward the Catholic Church. 7

Throughout its history, the CFC has been funded by progressive foundations with limited perceivable connection to Catholicism. The group’s early benefactors were the Religious Coalition for Abortion Rights (RCAR) and the National Abortion Rights Action League (now NARAL). 8

Since then, the CFC has been supported by wealthy organizations with a history of supporting Planned Parenthood and other pro-abortion groups. These have included the Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation, which gave the CFC over $18 million between 2006 and 2014,9 the Ford Foundation,10 and the William & Flora Hewlett Foundation.11

Between 2020 and 2023, Catholics for Choice received fiscal support from the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Hopewell Fund, Marin Community Foundation, Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc, Silicon Valley Community Foundation, Network For Good Inc, and Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund12

History

Catholics for Choice was originally called Catholics for a Free Choice (CFFC) and was founded as a 501(c)(4) lobby in New York City in October 1973, by three members of a local chapter of the National Organization for Women (NOW), Patricia Fogarty McQuillan, Joan Harriman, and Meta Mulcahy. Just a few months earlier, the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade legalized abortion in the United States and CFFC’s founders were “concerned that the gains of Roe could be temporary if an organized anti-abortion movement, supported by the Catholic Church, gained momentum.” 13

1970s

From its inception, CFFC has rejected the teachings of the Catholic Church on abortion and contraception, and has declared that the organization does not recognize the authority of the Church, the Pope and the bishops on these matters. In an early effort to emphasize this defiance, CFFC’s first executive director Patricia Fogarty McQuillan held a mock papal inauguration in front of Saint Patrick’s Cathedral in New York City on the first anniversary of Roe v. Wade. McQuillan declared herself “Her Holiness Pope Patricia the First” and then announced that women “would no longer accept the erroneous dictates of the magisterium or the ‘teaching authority’ of the church regarding women.”7

During the early 1970s, CFFC remained a small group in New York City with little money. McQuillan died in June 1974, and for the remainder of the 1970s CFFC teetered on bankruptcy, surviving on small grants from the Religious Coalition for Abortion Rights (RCAR), the National Abortion Rights Action League (now NARAL),8 and the Unitarian Universalist Church in New York. 14

In 1976, the organization moved to Washington, DC, and hired lobbyist Ginny Andary who visited members of Congress to make them aware of “pro-choice Catholic opinion.”15 In 1979, the board voted to spend its remaining budget on hiring Patricia McMahon as executive director.14 McMahon soon secured CFFC’s first large grant of $75,000 from the Sunnen Foundation, a manufacturer that produced Emko contraceptive foam. With the new investment, McMahon launched CFFC’s publications program, including its quarterly magazine Conscience.16

1979 continued to be a busy year at CFFC. First, the board and McMahon decided to shift the organization from a 501(c)(4) lobbying group to a 501(c)(3) educational organization, making CFFC eligible for foundation grants.15 McMahon argued that “publications, public speaking and convening like-minded groups of people around the country seemed the most important thing that CFFC could do.”16 Next, McMahon invited to the CFFC board executive director of the National Abortion Federation (NAF) Frances Kissling. 15 Kissling would become executive director in 1982 and serve in that role until 2007.

With Kissling in charge, CFFC’s funding increased. Early six-figure contributors included the Sunnen Foundation and other pro-abortion and pro-contraception philanthropies as the Brush Foundation, Gund Foundation, Packard Foundation, General Service Foundation, Educational Foundation of America, Public Welfare Foundation, John Merck Fund, Scherman Foundation, and MacArthur Foundation.17 CFFC also received $10,000 from the Playboy Foundation in 1982 and 1983. When critics suggested it was hypocrisy for a feminist organization to take money from a pornographer, Kissling claimed that she considered the funding “reparations.” 18

1980s

Throughout the 1980s, CFFC became more prolific, publishing pamphlets designed to provide ostensibly “Catholic” cover for abortion. The organization’s Abortion in Good Faith series, beginning with the 1981 We Are the Mainstream: Dissent in the Catholic Church argued that the progress of mankind over nature freed individuals from the teachings of the Church, which are an “entrenchment in past ignorance and a denial of present knowledge.” More specifically, regarding contraception and abortion, CFFC asserted, “the church’s real objection to personal reproductive choice is not that it violates natural and divine law,” but that it “calls for the placement of an individual’s judgment between herself or himself and church authority.”19

While rejecting the teachings of the Catholic Church, CFFC did adopt some of its teaching methodology in an attempt to appeal to Catholics. In 1983, CFFC board member Dan Maguire penned Abortion: A Guide to Making Ethical Choices, which was written like a catechism “so all kinds of people could read it and get good theological opinions stated understandably.”20 “Clinics were probably the biggest consumers of our materials,” said public affairs director Mary Jean Collins. “It was all about making Catholics comfortable with the choices they were making when the church said it was wrong.”21

Under Kissling’s direction, CFFC also became more active in coaching pro-abortion Catholic members of Congress and seeking opportunities for media exposure, like its 1981 “press conference” protesting the testimony of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops (NCCB) in support of the Hatch Human Life Amendment.20. It was in 1984, however, that Kissling generated her first major media exposure and what would prove to be one of the CFFC’s most widely-reported publicity efforts. In response to U.S. bishops denouncing the pro-abortion position of Democratic vice-presidential nominee Geraldine Ferraro, CFFC placed a full-page paid advertisement in The New York Times on October 7, titled “Catholic Statement on Pluralism and Abortion.”22 The statement acknowledged that “recent popes and the Catholic hierarchy” had condemned abortion as morally wrong, but went on to claim that this was not “the only legitimate Catholic position.”23

On November 14, the NCCB condemned the statement and on December 18, the Vatican announced that it had instructed every member of a religious order that had signed the statement to retract support of the statement or be subject to prosecution under canon law and possible dismissal from their orders.24 Within a year, the priests, brothers and all but two of the nuns retracted their support,25 but the controversy over the ad led to greater media coverage for the CFFC. By August 1986, the Washington Post Magazine ran a friendly story about Kissling titled, “The Cardinal of Choice.” In the article, Kissling is quoted as stating, “Jesus Christ didn’t come here and say, ‘You gotta have a pope, you gotta have cardinals, you gotta have bishops, you gotta have priests… This system is man-made and really modeled upon a European feudal system… What I am trying to do is to democratize and humanize the Church.”26

1990s

In 1990, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, CFFC published its Guide for Pro-choice Catholics, a compendium of articles and essays designed to assist pro-abortion Catholic politicians and candidates. CFFC also filed amicus briefs in the 1990s in several abortion cases reaching the Supreme Court, one of which was quoted from by liberal Justice John Paul Stevens in his dissenting opinion in Webster.27

CFFC extended its reach beyond the U.S. throughout the 1990s, helping establish partner organizations in Latin America under the umbrella Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir28 and winning recognition by the United Nations as a nongovernmental organization (NGO).

2000s

Shortly after the turn of the century, CFFC launched two new international efforts that are still operational as of 2017. The first, See Change, is an attempt to pressure the United Nations into revoking the Holy See’s Permanent Observer status.29 The second, Condoms4Life, is a campaign to raise awareness about the “devastating effect of the bishops’ ban on condoms.”30

The early 2000s also saw the CFFC broaden its scope to include support for “lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered Catholics.”3132 In 2007, the organization changed its name to Catholics for Choice (CFC), Kissling resigned, and Jon O’Brien became executive director.

Relationship with the Catholic Bishops

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, which is the membership association of the Catholic bishops of the United States and U.S. Virgin Islands, has consistently condemned CFC and rejected its claim to represent Catholicism.

  • “Because of its opposition to the human rights of some of the most defenseless members of the human race, and because its purposes and activities deliberately contradict essential teachings of the Catholic faith,….Catholics for a Free Choice merits no recognition or support as a Catholic organization.” Administrative Committee, National Conference of Catholic Bishops, 1993. 33
  • “For a number of years, a group calling itself Catholics for a Free Choice has been publicly supporting abortion while claiming it speaks as an authentic Catholic voice. That claim is false. In fact, the group’s activity is directed to rejection and distortion of Catholic teaching about the respect and protection due to defenseless unborn human life.” Bishop Joseph A. Fiorenza, president of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops, 2000. 33
  • “The organization rejects and distorts Catholic social teaching – and actually attacks its foundation. As Pope Francis said this summer to leaders in Poland, ‘Life must always be welcomed and protected … from conception to natural death. All of us are called to respect life and care for it.’” 34

Activities

CFC’s affiliated bloggers, essayists and spokespersons, as of 2025, provide ongoing purportedly “Catholic” justification for abortion to abortion providers, abortion-rights advocates, and pro-abortion Catholic politicians. The CFC also lobbies and coaches policy makers and organizes opposition to pro-life efforts to restrict abortion.35 The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) has continuously rejected CFC’s identification as a Catholic organization and has stated that the organization promotes positions contrary to Catholic teaching. 36

Since the group’s inception, CFC’s publicity efforts have been deliberately antagonistic toward the Catholic Church. In its first year, the organization’s executive director, Patricia Fogarty McQuillan, held a mock papal inauguration in front of Saint Patrick’s Cathedral in New York City, in which she declared herself “Her Holiness Pope Patricia the First.”7 In 1984, the organization placed a full-page ad in the New York Times titled, “Catholic Statement on Pluralism and Abortion,” signed by dissident Catholic theologians, priests and nuns. The ad declared that the Church’s teaching on abortion is not “the only legitimate Catholic position.”22 More recently, current executive director Jon O’Brien penned an article taking aim at the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) titled, “Nobody Gets to Say Who is and Who is not Catholic.”37

“Abortion in Good Faith”

Campaigning for federal funding of abortion in the U.S., CFC has taken out ads in national and local print publications across the country.38 CFC has also created a website where Catholics can sign an online pledge declaring that, “Public funding for abortion is a Catholic social justice value.”2

“See Change”

Launched in 2000, See Change is an ongoing attempt to pressure the United Nations into removing the Permanent Observer status of the Holy See.29 In its campaign video, CFC asks, “why is a fake state with few families allowed to obstruct women’s rights the world over..?” and “the Holy See should not be able to trade on its presumed moral authority.”29

Condoms4Life

Is an effort to raise awareness about the “devastating effect of the bishops’ ban on condoms,” and to force faith-based organizations that administer federally-funded international development aid to offer “evidence-based comprehensive services,” including condoms, sex education, and needle exchange programs.30

Leadership

Interim President, Christopher Wimbush

Prior to becoming interim president of Catholics for Choice, as of 2025, Chris Wimbush has worked as a legal professional and leadership strategist. Wimbush studied law at the the University of Virginia School of Law, after which he went on to work as a clerk in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. 39

Board Chairwoman, Erin Matson

Eric Matson is the chairperson of Catholics for Choice, as of 2025. She is pro-abortion group Reproaction‘s co-founder and executive director. Matson has been a pro-abortion activist and has previously worked as a vice president for the National Organization for Women and the editor-at-large for Rewire News Group. 40

Funding

Catholics for Choice reported total revenue of approximately $2.70 million in 2023, a notable increase from about $2.39 million in the previous period. This growth was driven primarily by contributions and grants, which totaled nearly $2.63 million and highlight the organization’s strong donor support. However, investment income experienced a significant drop, decreasing from around $187,000 the year prior to roughly $53,000, as of 2023, while other revenue streams saw a modest uptick. 41

On the expense side, the organization’s total spending, as of 2023, rose slightly to approximately $3.21 million, with salaries, employee benefits, and other compensation—its largest expense category—climbing from about $1.63 million to nearly $1.95 million. 41

Program service expenses, as of 2023 amounted to roughly $2.04 million, and fundraising costs were reported at around $536,000. Despite an operating deficit of about $509,000, the organization ended the 2023 fiscal year with an improved balance sheet, as total assets increased from approximately $14.21 million to nearly $14.89 million and liabilities declined from around $791,000 to $461,000. This resulted in a growth in net assets from roughly $13.42 million to about $14.43 million, according to Catholics for Choice’s tax filings.41

Between 2020 and 2023, Catholics for Choice received fiscal support from the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Hopewell Fund, Marin Community Foundation, Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc, Silicon Valley Community Foundation, Network For Good Inc, and Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund12

References

  1. “About Us.” Catholics For Choice. Accessed August 9, 2017. http://www.catholicsforchoice.org/about-us/
  2. Pledge. In Good Faith. Accessed August 13, 2017. http://ingoodfaith.us/pledge/
  3. U.S. Women’s Interests Groups: Institutional Profiles. Slavin, Sarah. 1995. Greenwood Press. PP. 98-99
  4. “About our Work.” Catholics for Choice. Accessed August 9, 2017. http://www.catholicsforchoice.org/about-us/about-our-work/
  5. “A Statement on Later Abortion.” Catholics For Choice Accessed August 13, 2017. http://www.catholicsforchoice.org/issues_publications/a-statement-on-later-abortion
  6. “The Truth about Catholics and Abortion.” Catholics for Choice. Published 2011. Accessed August 18, 2017. http://www.catholicsforchoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/TruthaboutCatholicsandAbortion.pdf
  7. Good Catholics: The Battle over Abortion in Catholic Church. Miller, Patricia. University of California Press. 2014. P. 67
  8. Good Catholics: The Battle over Abortion in Catholic Church. Miller, Patricia. University of California Press. 2014. P. 71
  9. Returns of Organization Exempt from Income Tax: The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation. 2006-2014.
  10. Returns of Organization Exempt from Income Tax: Ford Foundation. 2006-2015.
  11. Returns of Organization Exempt from Income Tax: William & Flora Hewlett Foundation. 2006-2015.
  12. “Nonprofit Explorer: Full Text Search Results for EIN 52-1154418.” ProPublica. Accessed October 10, 2023. https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/full_text_search?sort=best&form%5B%5D=IRS990ScheduleI&year%5B%5D=2022&year%5B%5D=2020&year%5B%5D=2023&year%5B%5D=2021&q=52-1154418&submit=Apply.
  13. Good Catholics: The Battle over Abortion in Catholic Church. Miller, Patricia. University of California Press. 2014. P. 65
  14. Good Catholics: The Battle over Abortion in Catholic Church. Miller, Patricia. University of California Press. 2014. P. 84
  15. U.S. Women’s Interests Groups: Institutional Profiles. Slavin, Sarah. Greenwood Press. 1995. Page 99.
  16. Good Catholics: The Battle over Abortion in Catholic Church. Miller, Patricia. University of California Press. 2014. P. 90
  17. Agent of Influence. Catholic League. Date Accessed August 9, 2017. http://www.catholicleague.org/agent-of-influence/
  18. Good Catholics: The Battle over Abortion in Catholic Church. Miller, Patricia. University of California Press. 2014. P.123.
  19. We are the Mainstream: Dissent in the Catholic Church. Ellingston, Jennifer. Catholics for a Free Choice. 1981. P. 15-18. http://bcrw.barnard.edu/archive/religion/We_Are_the_Mainstream.pdf
  20. U.S. Women’s Interests Groups: Institutional Profiles. Slavin, Sarah. 1995. Greenwood Press. Page 100-101
  21. Good Catholics: The Battle over Abortion in Catholic Church. Miller, Patricia. University of California Press. 2014. p. 101
  22. Catholic Identity: Balancing Reason, Faith, and Power. Dillon, Michele. Cambridge University Press. 1999. P. 106
  23. “Text of ‘A Catholic Statement on Pluralism and Abortion.’” UPI. Published December 18, 1984. Accessed August 10, 2017. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1984/12/18/Text-of-A-Catholic-Statement-on-Pluralism-and-Abortion/6237472194000/
  24. “Vatican Threat on Abortion Ad Went to Signers.” The New York Times. Published December 18, 1984. Accessed August 10, 2017. http://www.nytimes.com/1984/12/19/us/vatican-threat-on-abortion-ad-went-to-signers.html
  25. Roman Catholicism in America. Gillis, Chester. Columbia University Press. 1999. P. 182
  26. “The Cardinal of Choice.” Wallach, Janet. Washington Post Magazine. Published August 24, 1986. Accessed August 8, 2017. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/magazine/1986/08/24/the-cardinal-of-choice/a65e2ad4-7477-409f-b492-d043cb84210a/?utm_term=.e7ab916accbcn
  27. U.S. Women’s Interests Groups: Institutional Profiles. Slavin, Sarah. 1995. Greenwood Press. Page 101
  28. “International Partners.” Catholics For Choice. Accessed August 12, 2017. http://www.catholicsforchoice.org/international-partners/#catolicas-por-el-derecho-a-decidir-cdd-in-latin-america
  29. “The Holy See at the United Nations: Church or State?” Catholics For Choice. Accessed August 8, 2017. http://www.catholicsforchoice.org/the-holy-see-at-the-united-nations-church-or-state/
  30. “About the Condoms4Life Campaign.” Catholics For Choice. Accessed August 13, 2017. http://www.catholicsforchoice.org/about-the-condoms4life-campaign/
  31. “Catholics for a Free Choice Supports Demands of Gay and Lesbian Catholics.” Catholics For Choice. Published December 18, 2013. Accessed August 12, 2017. http://www.catholicsforchoice.org/catholics-for-a-free-choice-supports-demands-of-gay-and-lesbian-catholics/
  32. “Common Theology, Common Cause: Abortion and Gay and Lesbian Rights.” Collins, Mary Jean, and Conway, Margaret. Conscience, A Newsjournal of Prochoice Catholic Opinion: Vol. XI, No. 2, March/April 1990
  33. “President Issues Statement on Catholics for a Free Choice.” NCCB/USCC. Accessed August 10, 2017. http://www.usccb.org/news/2000/00-123.cfm
  34. “Cardinal Dolan, Bishops’ Pro-Life Chairman, on Deceptive ‘Catholics for Choice’ Ad Campaign.” USCCB. Accessed August 10, 2017. http://www.usccb.org/news/2016/16-118.cfm
  35. Abortion. Catholics for Choice. Accessed August 13, 2017. http://www.catholicsforchoice.org/abortion/
  36. NCCB/USCC President Issues Statement on Catholics for a Free Choice. USCCB – (Office of Media Relations) Accessed August 8, 2017. https://web.archive.org/web/20111113050709/http://old.usccb.org/comm/archives/2000/00-123.shtml
  37. “Nobody Gets to Say Who Is and Who Is Not Catholic.” The Huffington Post. Published October 5, 2012. Accessed August 13, 2017. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jon-obrien/nobody-gets-to-say-who-is-and-who-is-not-catholic_b_1940280.html
  38. New Campaign: Catholics Support Public Funding for Abortion in Good Faith. Catholics For Choice. Published March 7, 2017. Date Accessed August 12, 2017. http://www.catholicsforchoice.org/new-campaign-catholics-support-public-funding-for-abortion-in-good-faith/
  39. Wimbush Consulting. “Chris Wimbush.” Accessed February 26, 2025. https://www.wimbushconsulting.com/about-chris-1.
  40. Catholics for Choice, “Our Staff and Board,” accessed February 26, 2025, https://www.catholicsforchoice.org/who-we-are/our-staff-and-board/.
  41. Catholics for Choice, Form 990 (2023), Nonprofit Explorer, ProPublica, accessed February 26, 2025, https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/521154418/202422959349300712/full.
  See an error? Let us know!

Nonprofit Information

  • Accounting Period: December - November
  • Tax Exemption Received: August 1, 1979

  • Available Filings

    Period Form Type Total revenue Total functional expenses Total assets (EOY) Total liabilities (EOY) Unrelated business income? Total contributions Program service revenue Investment income Comp. of current officers, directors, etc. Form 990
    2023 Dec Form 990 $2,704,544 $3,213,999 $14,891,745 $460,983 N $2,630,460 $9,707 $301,032 $312,970
    2022 Dec Form 990 $2,390,870 $3,147,561 $14,206,866 $791,051 N $2,194,065 $9,654 $308,016 $303,686 PDF
    2021 Dec Form 990 $3,960,237 $2,761,473 $16,637,766 $323,474 N $1,766,582 $4,660 $291,679 $251,001
    2020 Dec Form 990 $2,879,289 $2,889,717 $16,100,724 $410,059 N $301,324 $240 $309,950 $381,092
    2019 Dec Form 990 $1,880,165 $3,282,204 $16,955,057 $561,200 N $981,787 $1,564 $739,168 $481,923 PDF
    2018 Dec Form 990 $5,398,572 $3,391,401 $16,677,413 $548,349 N $5,109,852 $1,054 $777,781 $276,069 PDF
    2017 Dec Form 990 $2,723,407 $3,270,752 $15,710,709 $498,502 N $1,882,448 $915 $581,576 $264,263 PDF
    2016 Dec Form 990 $5,920,853 $3,487,440 $15,292,738 $498,119 N $5,386,680 $1,570 $385,289 $263,917 PDF
    2015 Dec Form 990 $3,928,468 $3,444,408 $12,708,519 $568,987 N $3,334,182 $1,324 $459,202 $257,747 PDF
    2014 Dec Form 990 $4,106,630 $3,171,619 $12,750,746 $482,880 N $3,209,505 $1,568 $534,119 $453,583 PDF
    2013 Dec Form 990 $5,757,625 $3,332,904 $12,402,602 $702,235 N $5,349,355 $2,836 $387,850 $453,258 PDF
    2012 Dec Form 990 $2,736,283 $3,481,049 $8,755,870 $386,712 N $2,184,105 $3,605 $479,970 $449,004 PDF
    2011 Dec Form 990 $3,814,113 $3,137,896 $9,092,068 $360,483 N $3,456,447 $3,701 $303,559 $429,731 PDF
    2010 Dec Form 990 $2,816,944 $2,404,682 $9,063,740 $492,856 N $2,511,690 $3,188 $222,282 $415,553 PDF

    Additional Filings (PDFs)

    Catholics for Choice

    1436 U ST NW STE 301
    WASHINGTON, DC 20009-3988